scholarly journals Correction to: The Future of Precision Medicine: Potential Impacts for Health Technology Assessment

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-117
Author(s):  
James Love-Koh ◽  
Alison Peel ◽  
Juan Carlos Rejon-Parrilla ◽  
Kate Ennis ◽  
Rosemary Lovett ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 1439-1451 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Love-Koh ◽  
Alison Peel ◽  
Juan Carlos Rejon-Parrilla ◽  
Kate Ennis ◽  
Rosemary Lovett ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Hailey ◽  
Margareta Nordwall

Objectives: The aim of this study was to obtain information from members of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) on their involvement of consumers (patients, carers, and related organizations) in their programs.Methods: A questionnaire for a survey was developed and sent to member agencies in October 2005.Results: Of the thirty-seven agencies that provided responses, 57 percent involve consumers in some aspects of their HTA programs and 83 percent intend to involve consumers in the future. Summaries of HTA reports that are intended to be easily understood by consumers are prepared by 49 percent of the agencies, and 36 percent involve consumers in dissemination of HTA material.Conclusions: Most INAHTA members involve consumers in some aspects of their programs, although not always routinely. Involvement seems likely to increase in the future.


Vaccine ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (13) ◽  
pp. 1609-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe La Torre ◽  
Chiara de Waure ◽  
Giacomina Chiaradia ◽  
Alice Mannocci ◽  
Maria Lucia Specchia ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 236-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Hailey ◽  
Devidas Menon

The need for better communication and collaboration between health technology assessment agencies led to the formation of an International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA). The network now comprises 27 agencies and has been successful in improving exchange of information and in undertaking joint health technology assessment projects. Issues for the future include possible changes to criteria for membership and identification of resources for more extensive programs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 393-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcell Csanádi ◽  
András Inotai ◽  
Oleksandra Oleshchuk ◽  
Oksana Lebega ◽  
Brodovskaya Alexandra ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesThe need for improving healthcare decision making by implementing health technology assessment (HTA) has been a top priority in Ukraine since 2016. This study sought to provide a tailor-made HTA implementation roadmap, drawing on insights from national stakeholders.MethodsWe conducted a survey using a questionnaire already applied in previous HTA research. We assessed the status of HTA when reforms were initiated in 2016 and examined perspectives on possible future developments among policy makers and representatives of pharmaceutical companies and patient organizations.ResultsThirty-two respondents answered the survey. Forty-eight percent of respondents were not aware of HTA training in Ukraine, but 91 percent preferred having either a graduate or postgraduate training. Experts stated that funding for HTA research and for critical appraisal of HTA submissions was limited, but in the future, they would increase funding mainly from public sources. A public HTA agency with academic support was the most preferred organizational structure. Eighty-eight percent of respondents opted for full transparency, making the HTA agency's recommendations and the related appraisal reports publicly available. A great majority of participants preferred mandating the use of local data in certain categories and indicated the importance of evaluating the transferability of international evidence. Healthcare priority and cost-effectiveness were the most important criteria for decisions, applied with a soft explicit threshold.ConclusionsUkraine is in the early phase of implementing HTA and our study provides a clear vision of national stakeholders about the future directions. In addition, learning from the experiences of other countries may help the implementation process.


2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 228-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Sampietro-Colom ◽  
Sarah Thomas ◽  
Chris Henshall

Are we in a period of significant change? Is health technology assessment (HTA) undergoing a fundamental transformation? Or should it be? Are we in the middle of a paradigm shift? These are some of the questions the paper by Facey et al in this journal (1) raises about the future of HTA, based on discussions at the HTAi Policy Forum in February 2015. To further share the deliberations of the Forum and with a view to opening this debate among the wider HTA community, a panel within the HTAi 2015 Annual Meeting in Oslo was organized. Presentations at the panel included a summary of the HTAi Policy Forum deliberations and perspectives from a patient, a clinician, and representatives of an HTA organization, industry, and a health system. This letter presents issues and thoughts raised in the panel session.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document