Reframing side effect information in patient information leaflets

2020 ◽  
Vol 1810 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Drug Safety ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 721-727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Harris ◽  
Rebecca Dickinson ◽  
David K. Raynor ◽  
Jan MacDonald ◽  
Peter Knapp

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Svobodova ◽  
Rachel Hale ◽  
Kerry Hood ◽  
Katie Gillies ◽  
Jennifer Bostock ◽  
...  

Patients need to be informed about potential risks of taking part in clinical trials. A problem is that there are no standards telling researchers or ethics committees how these risks need to be communicated. Our background research suggests that the way harms are communicated can actually increase the risks of the harms occurring. Over half of our sample of 250,000 patients who took placebo pills (like sugar pills) in clinical trials reported some negative side effect (like pain or nausea but also more serious things). The aim of this study is to understand what information about trial harms and benefits stakeholders consider to be important for ‘principled participant information leaflets’ or ‘PrinciPILs’ to contain. The stakeholders will include patients, ethics committee members, industry representatives, medico-legal experts, psychologists, and trial managers.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inger Askehave ◽  
Karen Korning Zethsen

Since becoming mandatory in the EU in 1992, the patient information leaflet (PIL) has been the subject of an on-going discussion regarding its ability to provide easily understandable information. This study examines whether the lay-friendliness of Danish PILs has improved from 2000 to 2012 according to the Danish consumers. A reproduction of a questionnaire study from 2000 was carried out. The responses of the 2012 survey were compared to those of the 2000 survey and the analysis showed that Danes are less inclined to read the PIL in 2012 compared to 2000 and that the general interest in PILs has decreased. The number of respondents who deem the PIL easy to read has gone down. According to Danish consumers, the lay-friendliness of PILs has not improved from 2000 to 2012 and a very likely explanation could be that the PIL as a genre has become far too regulated and complex to live up to its original intentions. On the basis of the empirical results the article furthermore offers suggestions for practice changes.


Radiography ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Tutty ◽  
Geraldine O'Connor

BMJ Open ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. e007612-e007612 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. G. P. M. de Bont ◽  
M. Alink ◽  
F. C. J. Falkenberg ◽  
G.-J. Dinant ◽  
J. W. L. Cals

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document