scholarly journals Evaluation of a Blocked-Trials Procedure to Establish Complex Stimulus Control over Intraverbal Responses in Children with Autism

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Einar T. Ingvarsson ◽  
Rachel L. Kramer ◽  
Charlotte L. Carp ◽  
Anna I. Pétursdóttir ◽  
Heather Macias
2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew G. Swerdan ◽  
Rocío Rosales

An adapted alternating treatments design was used to compare the efficacy of echoic and textual prompts to teach three students with autism (ages 8–15) to ask questions related to two pre-selected topics of conversation. Participants were first required to answer questions related to the topics to determine whether accurate responses were within their repertoire. This was followed by a transfer of stimulus control procedure to teach participants to ask relevant questions to the experimenter on the same topics. Probes with a novel conversation topic were conducted in the natural environment with a peer, and follow-up probes were conducted after training. Results indicate questions taught using an echoic prompt were acquired in fewer trials to criterion than questions taught using a textual prompt for two of the three participants. Limitations and implications for future research will be discussed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-225
Author(s):  
Karen D. Ward ◽  
Smita Shukla Mehta

Social participation of children with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in natural environments can be enhanced by teaching them to communicate spontaneously, at least in situations where they have the motivation to access specific items or activities by controlling the amount of access for these stimuli. The purpose of this study was to determine if mand training, using a stimulus control transfer procedure would promote acquisition and generalization of mands for specific activities or objects evoked by motivating operations. Measurement variables included the frequency of motivation controlled (MO) versus multiply controlled mands during discrete trial training on a variety of verbal operants. Using a concurrent multiple baseline design across participants, visual analysis indicated that MO mands for out-of-view items increased substantially with generalization across targets, staff, and environments for three of the four participants. One participant did not respond to intervention to the same extent as others.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Rapp ◽  
Meeta R. Patel ◽  
Patrick M. Ghezzi ◽  
Christine H. O'Flaherty ◽  
Craig J. Titterington

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 198-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos K. Nikopoulos ◽  
Caroline Canavan ◽  
Panagiota Nikopoulou-Smyrni

Author(s):  
Heidi Skorge Olaff ◽  
Monica Vandbakk ◽  
Per Holth

AbstractThe present study aimed to investigate the blocking of stimulus control in three children with autism. We used a go/no-go procedure in a standard blocking paradigm. In Phase 1, we established one of two sounds or colored squares as a discriminative stimulus for touching a tablet screen. In Phase 2, a colored square was added to the sound or a sound was added to the colored square in a stimulus compound. The discrimination training continued as in Phase 1. We subsequently tested discriminative control by each of the single stimuli separately and by the compounds. Finally, after testing with no programmed consequences, we reestablished the original discrimination and replicated the test of stimulus control. The results support previous experiments by demonstrating that the establishment of discriminative control by a second stimulus by adding it to a previously established discriminative stimulus in a compound was blocked by the earlier discrimination training in all three participants. We discuss procedural details that may be critical to avoid the blocking of stimulus control in the applied field, particularly with respect to the acquisition of skills that involve multiple stimuli, such as joint attention, social referencing, and bidirectional naming.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document