scholarly journals Tolerability of an Immunologically Enhanced Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Preparation in Patients Treated with Concomitant Allergy Immunotherapy: A Non-Interventional Observational Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Reiber ◽  
Hendrik Wolf ◽  
Jörg Schnitker ◽  
Eike Wüstenberg
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Javier Solá Martínez ◽  
Virginia de Luque Piñana ◽  
Eloina González-Mancebo ◽  
Inmaculada Sánchez-Guerrero Villajos ◽  
Fernando García-González ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 314-325
Author(s):  
Harold S. Nelson

Allergy immunotherapy (AIT), whether administered as subcutaneous immunotherapy or as sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), is an effective treatment for sensitization to inhalant allergens. There remain, however, some important unresolved issues, such as the need for compelling evidence for or against the efficacy of treatment with multiple unrelated allergen extracts and optimal dosing with SLIT-liquid preparations. Both methods of AIT involve prolonged periods of treatment to achieve persisting benefit. This can be inconvenient and expensive, and failure to complete the period of prescribed treatment is common with both methods. New approaches are being developed and studied to make AIT more effective, safer, or more convenient. Among these approaches are using alternative routes of administration; using adjuvants, including vitamin D, Toll-like receptor ligand agonists, biologics, or probiotics; introducing additional SLIT tablets; defining the patterns of major and minor allergen sensitivity of patients and the content of allergen extracts to better match sensitization with treatment; and treating cats to reduce their allergen release. The allergen molecules themselves are being altered to make them less reactive with specific immunoglobulin E, both by creating allergoids and by using recombinant technology to produce modified allergen molecules. Which, if any, of these new approaches will become part of AIT practice in the next decade depends in part on their efficacy and in part on the availability of the resources to adequately study them.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 2039-2047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicia Allen-Ramey ◽  
Jianbin Mao ◽  
Cori Blauer-Peterson ◽  
Marvin Rock ◽  
Robert Nathan ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 143 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Alonso ◽  
E. Enrique ◽  
F. Pineda ◽  
M. Basagaña ◽  
M.M. San Miguel-Moncín ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. ar.2015.6.0111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara J. Daigle ◽  
Donna J. Rekkerth

Critical aspects of formulating allergy immunotherapy vaccines include the selection, total number, and proportions of each allergen component in therapeutic mixtures. The immunotherapy prescription, determined by a medical provider, details the dosing and schedule for treatment as well as the specific composition of the treatment vials. Allergen extracts are composed of many components such as proteins, glycoproteins, and proteases. Some components in allergen extracts are cross-reactive, meaning that treatment with an extract from one species may confer partial protection against a triggering allergen from another species. Conversely, some allergen extracts are incompatible with other extracts when combined in a mixture for treatment, resulting in lowered therapeutic potential for the patient. Therefore, knowledge of allergen extract cross-reactivities and incompatibilities guides the preparation of subcutaneous immunotherapy prescriptions. In a clinical setting, an understanding of what can and can not be mixed is one critical element in improving treatment outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document