Adverse Vascular Functional and Structural Changes Secondary to Breast Cancer and its Treatments with Adjuvant Therapy: a Systematic Review

Author(s):  
Alis Bonsignore ◽  
Priya Brahmbhatt ◽  
Daniel Santa Mina ◽  
Jack Goodman ◽  
Maureen Pakosh ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-84
Author(s):  
Shao-Hui Cai Shao-Hui Cai ◽  
Hua-Qing Chen ◽  
Yi-Si Li ◽  
Ya-Hua Lin ◽  
Qiu-Tong Tan ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnes LF Chan ◽  
Henry WC Leung ◽  
Chin-Li Lu ◽  
Shun Jin Lin

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 548-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liath Vidal ◽  
Irit Ben-Aharon ◽  
Shulamith Rizel ◽  
Rinat Yerushalmi ◽  
Aaron Sulkes ◽  
...  

548 Background: The role of bisphosphonates (BP) in the adjuvant setting in breast cancer has been evaluated in several studies, yielding inconsistent evidence. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluate the effects of BP treatment on survival in patients with early breast cancer in the adjuvant setting. Methods: RCTs that compared BP therapy in addition to the standard adjuvant therapy (cytotoxic or hormonal) with standard adjuvant therapy only were identified by searching the Cochrane Library, LILACS, MEDLINE databases and conference proceedings (12.2011). Hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and relative risks of adverse events were estimated and pooled. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Thirteen trials met the inclusion criteria., among which are the two recently published abstracts of large scale RCTs (NSABP-B34, GAIN) evaluating a total of 15,762 patients. Ten trials reported the OS outcome. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant benefit for BP (HR 0.89, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.01). Nine trials reported the DFS outcome. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant better DFS for the intervention (HR 0.95 (0.80-1.11)). Six trials reported DFS stratified upon menopausal status. Postmenopausal patients who were treated with BP therapy had statistically significant better DFS than the control group (HR 0.81(0.69-0.95)). In meta-regression, chemotherapy was negatively associated with HR of OS (coefficient, -0.23; standard error, 0.144). BP therapy resulted in less fractures in the intervention arm, but higher incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw and pyrexia. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis indicates a positive effect for adjuvant BP on survival outcomes only in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer. Meta-regression appraised the effect of confounders such as chemotherapy, showed a negative association between chemotherapy use and the effect of bisphosphonates on survival. Further large scale RCTs are warranted to unravel the specific subgroups and adjuvant treatments that would benefit from the addition of BP in the adjuvant setting.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 515-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Majid Davari ◽  
Bahman Amani ◽  
Fariborz Mokarian ◽  
Mohsen Hoseini ◽  
Arash Akbarzadeh ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 353-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonis Valachis ◽  
Nikolaos P. Polyzos ◽  
Robert E. Coleman ◽  
Michael Gnant ◽  
Holger Eidtmann ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Koumarianou ◽  
A Papanastasiou ◽  
K Kampoli ◽  
E Rizos ◽  
A Ntavatzikos ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadar Goldvaser ◽  
Tristan A Barnes ◽  
Boštjan Šeruga ◽  
David W Cescon ◽  
Alberto Ocaña ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. e40783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Wei Huang ◽  
Cheng Huang ◽  
Jian Liu ◽  
Hong-Yu Zheng ◽  
Lin Lin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document