Unstable angina: The significance of ST segment elevation or depression in patients without evidence of increased myocardial oxygen demand

1986 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 463-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Sclarovsky ◽  
Ehud Davidson ◽  
Boris Strasberg ◽  
Ruben F Lewin ◽  
Alexander Arditti ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. e235206
Author(s):  
Annick Judenherc Haouzi ◽  
Stefani Schwartz ◽  
Edward Liszka

A 53-year-old woman with atypical chest pain underwent a dobutamine stress echocardiogram (DSE) and developed a coronary spasm (CS) with severe pain and dramatic ST-segment elevation 9 min after dobutamine infusion was discontinued. The spasm resolved after sublingual nitroglycerin administration. The same-day coronary angiogram showed non-significant stenosis in the three coronary territories. Retrospectively, we found that the patient had vasospastic angina (VSA), a condition that has been strongly associated with the development of dobutamine-induced CS. Mechanisms of dobutamine-induced CS are not fully understood and include endothelial dysfunction leading to deficient nitric oxide-mediated coronary vasodilation in response to increased myocardial oxygen demand as well as imbalance between β1 and β2 adrenergic effects of dobutamine. Dobutamine-induced CS has also been much more frequently reported in patients from Asian descent with VSA. VSA should be systemically recognised in patients considered for DSE and, if present, other modalities of stress imaging should be discussed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Piatek ◽  
L Zandecki ◽  
J Kurzawski ◽  
A Janion-Sadowska ◽  
M Zabojszcz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Both unstable angina (UA) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) are still classified together in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes despite the fact they substantially differ in both clinical profile and prognosis. Purpose The aim of the present study was to evaluate contemporary clinical characteristics and outcomes of UA patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in comparison with stable angina (SCAD) and myocardial infarction (NSTEMI as well as STEMI) in Swietokrzyskie District of Poland in years 2014–2017. Methods A total of 7'187 patients after PCI from ORPKI Registry (38% with diagnosis of UA) were included into the analysis. Impact of clinical presentation (UA, SCAD, NSTEMI, STEMI) on 3-year outcomes were determined. Results UA patients were older that SCAD but younger than NSTEMI individuals. Diabetes and hypertension were more often encountered into UA group than in NSTEMI but less often than in SCAD cases. In UA group the percentage of previous myocardial infarction (MI), PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was the highest among all analyzed groups. In 3-year observation the risk of death as well as myocardial infarction (MI) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in unstable angina after PCI was higher than in stable angina but considerably lower than in NSTEMI group. Multivariate analysis confirmed that prognosis in NSTEMI was substantially worse in comparison with UA (RR 1.365, 95% CI: 1.126–1.655, p=0.0015). On the contrary there were no difference in mortality risk between UA and SCAD patients (RR 1.189, 95% CI: 0.932–1.518, p=0.1620). Parallel results were observed in respect of MI and MACE. Independ predictors of death were: age, kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes, previous stroke or previous PCI. Multivariate logistic regression analyse Clinical presentation Death Myocardial infarction MACE RR 95% CI p-value RR 95% CI p-value RR 95% CI p-value NSTEMI/UA 1.365 1.126–1.655 0.0015 1.822 1.076–3.055 0.0260 1.514 1.267–1.807 <0.0001 NSTEMI/SCAD 1.624 1.251–2.109 0.0003 1.882 0.982–3.789 0.0568 1.604 1.275–2.094 <0.0001 UA/SCAD 1.189 0.932–1.518 0.1620 1.033 0.557–2.034 0.9219 1.060 0.855–1.323 0.6023 MACE, major adverse cardiac events; NSTEMI, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; UA, unstable angina; SCAD, stable angina. Conclusion Unstable angina accounted for 38% of all cases and was the most common diagnosis in patients that underwent PCI in that time. 3-year prognosis in UA was considerable better in comparison with NSTEMI. On contrary there was no difference in outcomes (death, MI, MACE) between UA and SCAD patients.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Scott Wright ◽  
Joseph G Murphy

Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) present clinically when their disease enters an unstable phase known as an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), in which the cap of a previously stable atheromatous coronary plaque ruptures or erodes, which in turn activates a thrombotic cascade that may lead to coronary artery occlusion, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiogenic shock, and patient death. There are nearly 2 million episodes of ACS in the United States annually; it is the most common reason for hospitalization with CAD and is the leading cause of death in the developed world. ACS patients include those with unstable angina (UA), non–ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI), and ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and patients who die suddenly of an arrhythmia precipitated by coronary occlusion. The distinction among various ACS subgroups reflects varying characteristics of clinical presentation (presence or absence of elevated cardiac biomarkers) and the type of electrocardiographic (ECG) changes manifested on the initial ECG at the time of hospitalization. This chapter focuses on UA and non-STEMI. A graph outlines mortality risks faced by patients with varying degrees of renal insufficiency. An algorithm describes the suggested management of patients admitted with UA or non-STEMI. Tables describe the risk stratification of the patient with chest pain, categories of Killip class, examination findings of a patient with high-risk ACS, diagnosis of MI, causes of troponin elevation other than ischemic heart disease, initial risk stratification of ACS patients, and long-term medical therapies and goals in ACS patients. This review contains 2 highly rendered figures, 11 tables, and 76 references.


2016 ◽  
Vol 134 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-204
Author(s):  
Antonio de Padua Mansur ◽  
Alessandra Roggerio ◽  
Júlio Yoshio Takada ◽  
Pérola Michelle Vasconcelos Caribé ◽  
Solange Desirée Avakian ◽  
...  

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES: Glycoprotein inhibitors (abciximab, eptifibatide and tirofiban) are used in patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction before percutaneous coronary intervention. Of these, tirofiban is the least effective. We hypothesized that the response to tirofiban might be associated with glycoprotein gene mutations. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study at Emergency Unit, Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo. METHOD: Intrahospital evolution and platelet aggregation in response to tirofiban were analyzed in relation to four glycoprotein mutations in 50 patients indicated for percutaneous coronary intervention: 17 (34%) with unstable angina and 33 (66%) with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Platelet aggregation was analyzed using the Born method. Blood samples were obtained before and one hour after tirofiban infusion. Glycoproteins Ia (807C/T ), Ib (Thr/Met) , IIb (Ile/Ser ) and IIIa (PIA ) were the mutations selected. RESULTS: Hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, smoking, previous coronary artery disease and stroke were similar between the groups. Mutant glycoprotein IIIa genotypes had lower platelet aggregation before tirofiban administration than that of the wild genotype (41.0% ± 22.1% versus 55.9% ± 20.8%; P = 0.035). Mutant glycoprotein IIIa genotypes correlated moderately with lower platelet inhibition (r = -0.31; P = 0.030). After tirofiban administration, platelet glycoprotein Ia, Ib, IIb and IIIa mutations did not influence the degree of inhibition of platelet aggregation or intrahospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Mutations of glycoproteins Ia, Ib, IIb and IIIa did not influence platelet aggregation in response to tirofiban in patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.


Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Carlos Kaski ◽  
Luciano Consuegra-Sanchez ◽  
Daniel J. Fernandez-Berges ◽  
Jose M Cruz-Fernandez ◽  
Xavier Garcia-Moll ◽  
...  

Objectives: We sought to assess whether plasma neopterin predicts adverse clinical outcomes in patients with NSTEACS. Background: Circulating C reactive protein (CRP), a marker of inflammation, correlates with events in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). High neopterin levels - a marker of macrophage activation - predict cardiovascular events in stable angina patients but their prognostic role in NSTEACS has not been systematically evaluated. Methods: We prospectively assessed 397 patients (74 % men) admitted with NSTEACS: 169 (42.5%) had unstable angina and 228 (57.5%) non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Blood samples for neopterin and CRP assessment were obtained at admission. TIMI risk score was also assessed among other clinical and biochemical variables. The study end point was the composite of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction and recurrent angina at 180-days. Results: Baseline neopterin concentrations (nmol/L) were similar in unstable angina and NSTEMI patients (8.3 [6.5–10.6] vs 8.0 [6.2–11.1], p = 0.54). Fifty-nine patients (14.9 %) had events during follow-up (highest third (%) 21.5 vs 1 st and 2 nd thirds 11.5, log rank 7.341, p = 0.007). On multivariable hazard Cox regression, only neopterin (highest vs 1 st and 2 nd thirds, HR 2.15, 95 % CI [1.21–3.81]) was independently associated with the combined endpoint.CRP levels, however, were not significantly different in patients with events compared to those without events (adjusted HR = 0.98, p = 0.89, 95% CI 0.80 –1.21). Conclusion: Increased neopterin levels are an independent predictor of 180-day adverse cardiac events in patients with NSTEACS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document