Renal proximal tubular dysfunction and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria

1977 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur L. Riley ◽  
Lawrence M. Ryan ◽  
Donald A. Roth
2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (Supplement 27) ◽  
pp. 18-19
Author(s):  
S. J. Allen ◽  
M. A. Armstrong ◽  
T. J. McMurray ◽  
S. W. Macgowan ◽  
S. P. Penugonda ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 88 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 78S
Author(s):  
S.M.C. Gormley ◽  
&NA; Armstrong ◽  
I.S. Young ◽  
T.J. McMurray ◽  
W.T. McBride

BMJ ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 288 (6430) ◽  
pp. 1612-1613 ◽  
Author(s):  
P A Winstanley ◽  
J B Young ◽  
A T Axon ◽  
A M Brownjohn ◽  
E H Cooper

2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 1023-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sawako Yamazaki ◽  
Toru Watanabe ◽  
Seiichi Sato ◽  
Hideto Yoshikawa

Author(s):  
Detlef Bockenhauer ◽  
Robert Kleta

Up to 80% of filtered salt and water is returned back into the circulation in the proximal tubule. Several solutes, such as phosphate, glucose, low-molecular weight proteins, and amino acids are exclusively reabsorbed in this segment, so their appearance in urine is a sign of proximal tubular dysfunction. An entire orchestra of specialized apical and basolateral transporters, as well as paracellular molecules, mediate this reabsorption. Defects in proximal tubular function can be isolated (e.g. isolated renal glycosuria, aminoacidurias, or hypophosphataemic rickets) or generalized. In the latter case it is called the Fanconi–Debre–de Toni syndrome, based on the initial clinical descriptions. However, in clinical practice it is usually referred to as just the ‘renal Fanconi syndrome’. Severity of proximal tubular dysfunction can vary, and may coexist with some degree of loss of glomerular filtration capacity. Causes include a wide range of insults to proximal tubular cells, including a number of genetic conditions, drugs and poisons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document