Relation between receptor potential and resistance change in the frog taste cells

1973 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 455-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshihide Sato ◽  
Lloyd M. Beidler
1988 ◽  
Vol 405 (1) ◽  
pp. 699-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Miyamoto ◽  
Y Okada ◽  
T Sato

1993 ◽  
Vol 174 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Y Okada ◽  
T Miyamoto ◽  
T Sato

The ionic mechanism underlying the receptor potential induced by a deionized water stimulus was studied in frog taste cells with conventional microelectrodes. The taste cells located in the proximal portion of the tongue generated a depolarizing receptor potential which averaged 10mV in response to stimulation with deionized water. The cell membrane of the water-sensitive taste cell could be divided into the taste-receptive (apical) and basolateral membranes and the cells were classified into two types: Cl(-)-dependent and Cl(-)-independent. In Cl(-)-dependent cells whose input resistance was decreased or unchanged by deionized water, the magnitude of the water-induced depolarization decreased with an increase in concentration of superficial Cl- in contact with the receptive membrane and with addition of blockers of anion channels (0.1 mmol l-1 SITS and 0.1 mmol l-1 DIDS) to deionized water. The reversal potential for the depolarization in this type shifted according to the concentration of superficial Cl-. These properties of the responses were consistent with those of the glossopharyngeal nerve which innervates the taste disc. In Cl(-)-independent cells whose input resistance was increased by deionized water, the reversal potential was approximately equal to the equilibrium potential for K+ at the basolateral membrane. The water-induced response of the glossopharyngeal nerve was decreased to about 60% of the control value by addition of interstitial 2 mmol l-1 Ba2+. It is concluded that the water-induced receptor potential is produced by Cl- secretion through the taste-receptive membrane in about 70% of water-sensitive frog taste cells, while it is generated by an inhibition of the resting K+ conductance of the basolateral membrane in the remaining 30% of the cells.


1991 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 580-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. S. Herness

1. Discrimination among stimuli with similar physical properties represents a formidable problem in sensory neurophysiology. The differential effect of cobalt chloride treatment on gustatory responses to monovalent and divalent salts may help to explain aspects of how the frog gustatory system encodes these stimuli. 2. Gustatory neural responses recorded from the glossopharyngeal nerve to divalent stimuli (CaCl2 and MgCl2) were inhibited by CoCl2 treatment, whereas monovalent responses (NaCl and KCl) were greatly augmented. Both effects were highly significant and completely reversible. 3. Intracellular recordings from the gustatory receptor cells, which synaptically initiate the impulses in the glossopharyngeal afferents, imply that these neural events are not a simple reflection of the receptor potential magnitude. Monovalent receptor potentials magnitudes (millivolts of depolarization) were enhanced by cobalt chloride, but receptor potentials to divalent stimuli were not inhibited. Rather they were either unaffected (MgCl2) or augmented (CaCl2). 4. Membrane resistance change during salt stimulation with cobalt chloride treatment followed the qualitative pattern observed with the neural response. Membrane resistance (in megohms) of the receptor cell was greater for divalent stimuli with cobalt treatment compared with divalent stimuli alone. Membrane resistance changes for monovalent stimuli were less with cobalt treatment compared with monovalent stimuli alone. These observations indicate that the glossopharyngeal neural response is not a simple reflection of the magnitude of the receptor potential but must be considered in conjunction with membrane resistance as an indicator of synaptic transmission. 5. These data were interpreted in terms of leading models of salt taste transduction, i.e., adsorption theories, phase boundary theories, and the direct penetration theories. Relevant mechanistic considerations for salt taste transduction in the frog include binding by divalents to membrane surface changes and amiloride-sensitive monovalent cation channels. It was concluded that the surface potential alone was not a critical variable in the mechanism of cobalt chloride alteration of salt responses.


1975 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 735-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Sato ◽  
L M Beidler

The electrical properties of the frog taste cells during gustatory stimulations with distilled water and varying concentrations of NaCl were studied with intracellular microelectrodes. Under the Ringer adaptation of the tongue, two types of taste cells were distinguished by the gustatory stimuli. One type, termed NaCl-sensitive (NS) cells, responded to water with hyperpolarizations and responded to concentrated NaCl with depolarizations. In contrast, the other type of cells, termed water-sensitive (WS) cells, responded to water depolarizations and responded to concentrated NaCl with hyperpolarizations. The membrane resistance of both taste cell types increased during the hyperpolarizing receptor potentials and decreased during the depolarizing receptor potentials, Reversal potentials for the depolarizing and hyperpolarizing responses in each cell type were a few millivolts positive above the zero membrane potential. When the tongue was adapted with Na-free Ringer solution for 30 min, the amplitude of the depolarizing responses in the NS cells reduced to 50% of the control value under normal Ringer adaptation. On the basis of the present results, it is concluded (a) that the depolarizing responses of the NS and WS cells under the Ringer adaptation are produced by the permeability increase in some ions, mainly Na+ ions across the taste cell membranes, and (b) that the hyperpolarizing responses of both types of taste cells are produced by a decrease in the cell membrane permeability to some ions, probably Na+ ions, which is slightly enhanced during the Ringer adaptation.


1989 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 591-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miyamoto Takenori ◽  
Okada Yukio ◽  
Sato Toshihide

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 491-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Sato ◽  
K. Nishishita ◽  
Y. Okada ◽  
K. Toda

1987 ◽  
Vol 510 (1 Olfaction and) ◽  
pp. 23-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
TOSHIHIDE SATO ◽  
YUKIO OKADA ◽  
TAKENORI MIYAMOTO

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document