The time-course of recovery of flexor reflex responses after habituation and sensitization

1974 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A. Pearson
1980 ◽  
Vol 197 (2) ◽  
pp. 538-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Duysens ◽  
G.E. Loeb ◽  
B.J. Weston

1996 ◽  
Vol 57 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 63-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Magerl ◽  
Martin Koltzenburg ◽  
Jörg M. Schmitz ◽  
Hermann O. Handwerker
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Aldridge ◽  
R. B. Stein

1. Pairs of brief stretches or a series of stretches at random intervals (Poisson process) were applied to a slow (soleus) and a fast (plantaris) muscle in decerebrate cats to analyze the nonlinear effects of one stretch on the reflex responses to subsequent stretches. Neural activity, electromyogram (EMG), and force were recorded. The reflex responses due to stretch were compared with reflexes as a result of electrical stimulation of nerves. Nonlinearities of muscle were also examined in the absence of reflexes. Short-latency neural activity produced by the stimuli at all intervals studied was quite constant, so changes in sensory activity cannot account for the nonlinearities. Three phases of nonlinear interactions were observed, and mechanisms for these nonlinearities are suggested. 2. For short intervals (less than 100 ms) following a stretch the force and EMG produced by a second stretch is depressed. This early depression could be due to the after hyperpolarization of the motoneuron cel body or to synaptic mechanisms, since the depression of EMG is seen with electrical stimulation of Ia sensory, but not alpha-motor axons. In addition, a second stretch can disrupt the reflex contraction produced by the first stretch if it occurs at a time when new actomyosin bonds are not readily formed. Because of this force suppression, the total reflex force produced in response to two stretches may be less than the response to a single stretch. 3. For intervals between 100 and 300 ms the force and EMG produced by a second stretch is enhanced. This potentiation is also seen with electrical stimulation of large sensory but not motor axons and could result from a synchronization of motoneuronal excitability cycles. It is more prominent in the homogeneous (soleus) muscle than the mixed (plantaris) muscle, probably because the motoneuron cell bodies will reach a period of high excitability at more nearly the same time in the homogeneous muscle. 4. For longer intervals the force produced by a second stretch is reduced even when the EMG is close to control values. This late depression is also observed with electrical stimulation of cut motor axons and therefore arises from the contractile properties of muscles. 5. With a random series of stretches, the same time course of nonlinear interactions is observed. However, as the mean rate of the random stretches is increased, the average response of the reflex decreases. Thus, the stretch reflex will be most effective in correcting for occasional perturbations to a movement, rather than for continuously varying disturbances.


PAIN RESEARCH ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuo Okamoto ◽  
Nozomi Ami ◽  
Hidehiko Oshima

2005 ◽  
Vol 168 (4) ◽  
pp. 566-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Wu ◽  
T. George. Hornby ◽  
Jennifer H. Kahn ◽  
Brian D. Schmit

2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 2220-2231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshitaka Kimura ◽  
Hiroaki Gomi

It is known that somatosensory reflex during voluntary arm movement is modulated anticipatorily according to given tasks or environments. However, when and how reflex amplitude is set remains controversial. Is the reflex modulation completed preparatorily before movement execution or does it vary with the movement? Is the reflex amplitude coded in a temporal manner or in a spatial (or state-dependent) manner? Here we studied these issues while subjects performed planar reaching movements with upcoming opposite (rightward/leftward) directions of force fields. Somatosensory reflex responses of shoulder muscles induced by a small force perturbation were evaluated at several points before the arm encountered predictable force fields after movement start. We found that the shoulder flexor reflex responses were generally higher for the rightward than for the leftward upcoming force fields, whereas the extensor reflex responses were higher for the leftward force field. This reflex amplitude depending on the upcoming force field direction became prominent as the reflex was evoked closer to the force fields, indicating continuous changes in reflex modulation during movement. An additional experiment further showed that the reflex modulation developed as a function of the temporal distance to the force fields rather than the spatial distance. Taken together, the results suggest that, in the force field interaction task, somatosensory reflex amplitude during the course of movement is set anticipatorily on the basis of an estimate of the time-to-contact rather than the state-to-contact, to upcoming dynamical interaction during voluntary movement.


1996 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Ren ◽  
Bengt Linderoth ◽  
Björn A. Meyerson

✓ The physiological mechanisms responsible for pain relief caused by spinal cord stimulation (SCS) are essentially unknown and recent experimental data are sparse. In the present study the authors explored the possible involvement of supraspinal mechanisms in the effects of SCS applied in rats with experimental mononeuropathy produced by sciatic nerve ligation according to the method of Bennett and Xie or that of Seltzer, et al. Confirming results of a previous study undertaken by the authors, the thresholds of the early component of the flexor reflex (latency 8–12 msec), which is mediated by A fibers, were significantly lower in the nerve-ligated than in the intact leg. In halothane-anesthetized animals the spinal cord was exposed and SCS was applied with parameters similar to those used in clinical SCS. Ten minutes of SCS produced a significant elevation of the lowered threshold of the early flexor component only in the nerve-ligated leg, and this augmentatory effect of SCS persisted for 30 to 40 minutes after cessation of the stimulation. The threshold elevation amounted to between 50% and 80% of the prestimulatory value and it was related to the intensity of SCS. The threshold of the late, C-fiber—mediated component of the flexor reflex was not influenced in either of the legs. After transection of the spinal cord at the T-6 level, there was a moderate threshold increase in both the early and late components in both legs, but the threshold of the early component in the nerve-ligated leg remained lower. Spinal cord stimulation produced an almost identical threshold increase in the early component in the nerve-ligated leg with the same time course as before the transection. There was no effect on the late component of the reflex in either leg. The results indicate that this effect of SCS in mononeuropathic rats does not necessarily involve supraspinal mechanisms; instead SCS is operative at a spinal, segmental level. In view of the similarities between the effects of therapeutic SCS on cutaneous hypersensibility in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain and the effects demonstrated in neuropathic rats, the clinical pain relief achieved with SCS may be produced, at least partially, by intraspinal mechanisms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document