X chromosome-induced reversion of chromosome segregation in mouse/Chinese hamster somatic cell hybrids

1983 ◽  
Vol 146 (2) ◽  
pp. 401-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrina D. Pravtcheva ◽  
Frank H. Ruddle
Genome ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 528-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula A. Zelesco ◽  
Jennifer A. Marshall Graves

Hamster β-tubulin (detected as a mutant subunit that confers Colcemid resistance) is either not expressed or is underexpressed in Chinese hamster–mouse somatic cell hybrids. This selectivity of tubulin expression suggests that a uniparental mouse spindle might preferentially engage mouse chromosomes and lead to loss of hamster chromosomes. However, the repression of hamster tubulin was found to have no bearing on the direction of chromosome segregation occurring in eight hybrids studied, some of which segregated predominantly mouse and others hamster chromosomes. Key words: chromosome segregation, cell hybrids, spindle, tubulin.


1981 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 336-346
Author(s):  
C E Campbell ◽  
R G Worton

Somatic cell hybrids heterozygous at the emetine resistance locus (emtr/emt+) or the chromate resistance locus (chrr/chr+) are known to segregate the recessive drug resistance phenotype at high frequency. We have examined mechanisms of segregation in Chinese hamster cell hybrids heterozygous at these two loci, both of which map to the long arm of Chinese hamster chromosome 2. To follow the fate of chromosomal arms through the segregation process, our hybrids were also heterozygous at the mtx (methotrexate resistance) locus on the short arm of chromosome 2 and carried cytogenetically marked chromosomes with either a short-arm deletion (2p-) or a long-arm addition (2q+). Karyotype and phenotype analysis of emetine- or chromate-resistant segregants from such hybrids allowed us to distinguish four potential segregation mechanisms: (i) loss of the emt+- or chr+-bearing chromosome; (ii) mitotic recombination between the centromere and the emt or chr loci, giving rise to homozygous resistant segregants; (iii) inactivation of the emt+ or chr+ alleles; and (iv) loss of the emt+- or chr+-bearing chromosome with duplication of the homologous chromosome carrying the emtr or chrr allele. Of 48 independent segregants examined, only 9 (20%) arose by simple chromosome loss. Two segregants (4%) were consistent with a gene inactivation mechanism, but because of their rarity, other mechanisms such as mutation or submicroscopic deletion could not be excluded. Twenty-one segregants (44%) arose by either mitotic recombination or chromosome loss and duplication; the two mechanisms were not distinguishable in that experiment. Finally, in hybrids allowing these two mechanisms to be distinguished, 15 segregants (31%) arose by chromosome loss and duplication, and none arose by mitotic recombination.


1973 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ans Jongsma ◽  
Harry Someren ◽  
Andries Westerveld ◽  
Ann Hagemeijer ◽  
Peter Pearson

1984 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven H. Zuckerman ◽  
Joseph F. Solus ◽  
Frances P. Gillespie ◽  
Jerome M. Eisenstadt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document