A geometric model of the lumbar spine in the sagittal plane

1993 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 348
Author(s):  
Claude Sicard ◽  
Micheline Gagnon
Spine ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 646-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude Sicard ◽  
Micheline Gagnon

Spine Surgery ◽  
2005 ◽  
pp. 655-674
Author(s):  
Nevan G. Baldwin ◽  
Shunji Matsunaga ◽  
Bruce L. Ehni

Spine ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (20) ◽  
pp. 2242-2247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cengiz Cabukoğlu ◽  
Osman Güven ◽  
Yakup Yildirim ◽  
Hasan Kara ◽  
Saime Sezgin Ramadan

2012 ◽  
Vol 548 ◽  
pp. 433-437
Author(s):  
Jesse Ruan ◽  
Ao Yang Yu ◽  
Wei Zhao ◽  
Hai Yan Li

The purpose of this study was to investigate injury mechanism and injury biomechanical response of children lumbar segment L4-L5. Firstly, the geometric model of lumbar segment at L4-L5 was extracted from CT scan images of a healthy 6-year-old child for from repairing and refining by reverse engineering software Geomagic to finite element (FE) pre-processing by Hypermesh. The FE model was calculated by LS-Dyna under the conditions given by cadaveric experiments, in which a static load was applied to the center of lumber segment at L4-L5 by a metal plate. The static load was subsequently moved forward and backward 10mm in sagittal plane, respectively. The interfacial force between articular surfaces was the objective to investigate for the comparison between the simulation and the cadaveric experiment as well as the simulation by adult FE model. The simulated results showed that the displacement between L4 and L5 of children was, to some extent, smaller than that of adults. The ratio of calculated force between articular surfaces of L4-L5 of children to the applied force moreover was, to a great extent, smaller than that of adults. Children are much easier to be rendered injury at L4-L5 than adults are, because articular surfaces of children relatively more slightly contribute to distributing the force that nucleus pulposus undergoes than those of adults do. Hence, the current study could be perceived as a theoretical basis for the product design toward vehicle safety.


2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 445-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Harvey ◽  
David Hukins ◽  
Francis Smith ◽  
Douglas Wardlaw ◽  
Deiary Kader

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (02) ◽  
pp. 1750010
Author(s):  
Hsiang-Ho Chen ◽  
Cheng-Han Chung ◽  
Chi-Chen Lee ◽  
Cheng-Shu Yang ◽  
Yu-Shin Wen ◽  
...  

Background: The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of neck and low back discomfort and its association with intervertebral angulations of cervical and lumbar during neutral and flexion among aircrews. Methods: There were 283 subjects participating in this survey. All participants finished one questionnaire each regarding complaints about musculoskeletal symptoms, and three sagittal plane radiographs. The measurements of intervertebral angulations were completed using the Cobb method for lumbar spine and the Harrison posterior tangent method for the cervical spine. Results: In the questionnaire, 26.5% subjects self-reported neck discomfort and 33.2% subjects self-reported low back discomfort. Based on categorization by self-reported complaints, there was significant decrease in two intervertebral flexion angles of the Discomfort group than those of the Regular group, including C3/C4 and C2/C7. Based on categorization by radiological diagnoses, the abnormal group revealed significant decreases in the regular range of motion from neutral to flexion at C3/C4 segment. Lordotic angles between L1 and L5 were also found to be significantly different between the Discomfort group and the Regular group. Conclusions: A high prevalence of neck and low back discomfort among the aircrews is revealed and needs more suitable intervention. A certain level of association between spinal discomfort and the intervertebral angulations of the lumbar spine and the cervical spine in aircrews was found when compared to the normal group.


2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 371-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhan Liu ◽  
Tsung-Yuan Tsai ◽  
Shaobai Wang ◽  
Minfei Wu ◽  
Weiye Zhong ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 423-435
Author(s):  
Daniel Viggiani ◽  
Erin M. Mannen ◽  
Erika Nelson-Wong ◽  
Alexander Wong ◽  
Gary Ghiselli ◽  
...  

People developing transient low back pain during standing have altered control of their spine and hips during standing tasks, but the transfer of these responses to other tasks has not been assessed. This study used video fluoroscopy to assess lumbar spine intervertebral kinematics of people who do and do not develop standing-induced low back pain during a seated chair-tilting task. A total of 9 females and 8 males were categorized as pain developers (5 females and 3 males) or nonpain developers (4 females and 5 males) using a 2-hour standing exposure; pain developers reported transient low back pain and nonpain developers did not. Participants were imaged with sagittal plane fluoroscopy at 25 Hz while cyclically tilting their pelvises anteriorly and posteriorly on an unstable chair. Intervertebral angles, relative contributions, and anterior–posterior translations were measured for the L3/L4, L4/L5, and L5/S1 joints and compared between sexes, pain groups, joints, and tilting directions. Female pain developers experienced more extension in their L5/S1 joints in both tilting directions compared with female nonpain developers, a finding not present in males. The specificity in intervertebral kinematics to sex-pain group combinations suggests that these subgroups of pain developers and nonpain developers may implement different control strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document