Size-constancy in children measured by a functional size-discrimination task

1969 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 366-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith L Rapoport
1973 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 323-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Webb

10 children with withdrawn personality disturbances showed significantly greater response variability on a stereoscopic size-discrimination task than did children with very aggressive conduct disturbances or normal controls. It is proposed that mechanisms associated with the reliable initiation and maintenance of cognition are more salient than those involving primary sensory/perceptual coding.


2021 ◽  
pp. 095679762199520
Author(s):  
Nirit Fooks ◽  
Bat-Sheva Hadad ◽  
Orly Rubinsten

Although researchers have debated whether a core deficit of nonsymbolic representation of magnitude underlies developmental dyscalculia (DD), research has mostly focused on numerosity processing. We probed the possibility of a general magnitude deficit in individuals with DD and asked whether sensitivity to size varied in contexts of depth ordering and size constancy. We measured full psychometric functions in size-discrimination tasks in 12 participants with DD and 13 control participants. Results showed that although people with DD exhibited veridical perceived magnitude, their sensitivity to size was clearly impaired. In contrast, when objects were embedded in depth cues allowing size-constancy computations, participants with DD demonstrated typical sensitivity to size. These results demonstrate a deficit in the perceptual resolutions of magnitude in DD. At the same time, the finding of an intact size constancy suggests that when magnitude perception is facilitated by implicit mandatory computations of size constancy, this deficit is no longer evident.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 829-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Schmitt ◽  
Iris Kröger ◽  
Dietmar Zinner ◽  
Josep Call ◽  
Julia Fischer

1976 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-62
Author(s):  
Philip N. Hocker ◽  
Douglas Muller

A two-stimulus size-discrimination and transposition task was administered to 120 native Spanish-speaking, bilingual first, second and third grade students from bilingual instruction and English-only instruction classrooms. Half of the Ss learned the task and verbalized stimulus selection responses in Spanish, half in English. Results suggest that these bilingual students learned the initial discrimination task more rapidly when they verbalized in Spanish. English-only classroom students tended to transpose more when they had verbalized selection responses in Spanish, bilingual classroom students transposed more when they had verbalized in English. No significant differences in rate of discrimination task learning were observed between the two instructional programs.


1972 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 535-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Raymond Blair

Third-grade middle-class children performed a size-discrimination task under one of 5 reward conditions (consumable, nonconsumable, token-consumable, token-nonconsumable, token) or a control condition. The reward groups were comparable in performance and markedly superior to the control group. Contrary to expectations, response-contingent nonconsumable rewards were not more distracting than response-contingent consumable rewards nor was the token-reward system for presenting these material rewards less distracting than the response-contingent reinforcement procedure.


2003 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-425
Author(s):  
Helen E. Ross

Lehar argues that a simple Neuron Doctrine cannot explain perceptual phenomena such as size constancy but he fails to discuss existing, more complex neurological models. Size models that rely purely on scaling for distance are sparse, but several models are also concerned with other aspects of size perception such as geometrical illusions, relative size, adaptation, perceptual learning, and size discrimination.


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 145
Author(s):  
Lore Thaler ◽  
Megan Cutts ◽  
Denise Foresteire ◽  
Alison Wilkinson ◽  
Charlotte Atkin

2017 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 93-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah-Elizabeth Byosiere ◽  
Lynna C. Feng ◽  
Philippe A. Chouinard ◽  
Tiffani J. Howell ◽  
Pauleen C. Bennett

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document