A simple method for measuring MTF in direct digital intraoral radiography

1994 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 802-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
William D. McDavid ◽  
Ulf Welander ◽  
Gerard C.H. Sanderink ◽  
S.Brent Dove ◽  
Gunilla Tronje
Author(s):  
Munetaka Naitoh ◽  
Hidemichi Yuasa ◽  
Masahiko Toyama ◽  
Masaru Shiojima ◽  
Moriatsu Nakamura ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 248-258
Author(s):  
Louise Marron ◽  
Jennifer Rawlinson ◽  
Kirk McGilvray ◽  
Ben Prytherch

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare root and root canal width measurements between digital intraoral radiography (IOR) and micro-computed tomography (μCT). The accuracy of IOR measurements of canine mandibular molars was scrutinized to assess feasibility of developing a model to estimate animal age based on dentinal thickness. Materials and Methods: Thirty-nine canine mandibular first molars were imaged using μCT and IOR. For each tooth, the root and root canal width of the mesial and distal roots were measured by a single observer at 3 marked sites on μCT and IOR. Two different software programs were used to measure the radiographs. The radiograph measurements were compared to each other and to the μCT measurements. The μCT images were considered the anatomic reference standard for structural representation. Results: The data collected demonstrated IOR bias and variability throughout all measurement sites, with some sites being more affected than others. Neither IOR system produced unbiased measurements that closely reflected the μCT measurements consistently. The overall lack of agreement between measurements demonstrated the difficulties in developing a standardized protocol for measuring root and root canal width for the first molar teeth in dogs. Conclusion: Developing a protocol to accurately measure and compare μCT and IOR measurements is challenging. Designing a measurement system that would allow for universal application to age dogs would require continued research utilizing a standardized approach to overcome the limitations identified in this article.


2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Salemi ◽  
Samira Saati ◽  
Sepideh Falah-Kooshki

<p><strong>Objective</strong>: Measurement of root canal length is one of the most important stages of endodentic treatment, and any error at this stage can lead to the failure. This study aimed to compare conventional and digital intraoral radiography in measurement of root canal length.  <strong>   Material and Methods: </strong>In this study, 35 single-canal maxillary teeth were collected. Access cavities were prepared. An endodontic number 10#K- file was introduced into the canal, until the tip was visible at the apical foramen and the actual canal length (gold standard) was determined. After acquisition conventional radiographs using E-Ektaspeed and F-Insight film (Eastman-Kodak Co. Rochester, NY, USA) and digital radiographs using Photostimulable Phosphor Plates(PSP) (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland) and Charge Coupled Devices (CCD)(RVG, Trophy,NY,USA). they were examined separately with a two-week interval by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists. The data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey’s tests using SPSS-19 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).<strong>   Result: </strong>No statistically significant difference was observed between different radiographies, and different observers (P &gt; 0.05). Nevertheless, in comparison with the gold standard, in all cases, the F-speed conventional radiography and the digital CCD radiography showed the highest and the lowest accuracy, respectively. Also, the PSP and the E-speed conventional radiography were in the second and third order of accuracy, respectively.<strong>  Conclusion: </strong>The use of digital radiography does not improve the accuracy of the root canal length measurement,but the digital technique has advantages,such as the reduced patient exposure ,eliminating the time consuming processing stages, and producing fast images.</p>


2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 20160030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samaneh Bayat ◽  
Ahmad Reza Talaeipour ◽  
Fatemeh Sarlati

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document