Odor discrimination performance as affected by cortical, thalamic and cerebellar lesions in rats

1980 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 797-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Thompson
Sensors ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 2658
Author(s):  
Weiqing Guo ◽  
Haohui Kong ◽  
Junzhang Wu ◽  
Feng Gan

The aim of this study is to improve the discrimination performance of electronic noses by introducing a new method for measuring the similarity of the signals obtained from the electronic nose. We constructed abstract odor factor maps (AOFMs) as the characteristic maps of odor samples by decomposition of three-way signal data array of an electronic nose. A similarity measure for two-way data was introduced to evaluate the similarities and differences of AOFMs from different samples. The method was assessed by three types of pipe and powder tobacco samples. Comparisons were made with other techniques based on PCA, SIMCA, PARAFAC and PARAFAC2. The results showed that our method had significant advantages in discriminating odor samples with similar flavors or with high VOCs release.


2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 1089-1102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel W. Wesson ◽  
Justus V. Verhagen ◽  
Matt Wachowiak

Many mammals display brief bouts of high-frequency (4–10 Hz) sniffing when sampling odors. Given this, high-frequency sniffing is thought to play an important role in odor information processing. Here, we asked what role rapid sampling behavior plays in odor coding and odor discrimination by monitoring sniffing during performance of discrimination tasks under different paradigms and across different levels of difficulty and by imaging olfactory receptor neuron (ORN) input to the olfactory bulb (OB) during behavior. To eliminate confounds of locomotion and object approach, all experiments were performed in head-fixed rats. Rats showed individual differences in sniffing strategies that emerged during discrimination learning, with some rats showing brief bouts of rapid sniffing on odorant onset and others showing little or no change in sniff frequency. All rats performed with high accuracy, indicating that rapid sniffing is not necessary for odor discrimination. Sniffing strategies remained unchanged even when task difficulty was increased. In the imaging experiments, rapid sniff bouts did not alter the magnitude of odorant-evoked inputs compared with trials in which rapid sniffing was not expressed. Furthermore, rapid sniff bouts typically began before detectable activation of ORNs and ended immediately afterward. Thus rapid sniffing did not enable multiple samples of an odorant before decision-making. These results suggest that the major functional contribution of rapid sniffing to odor discrimination performance is to enable the animal to acquire the stimulus more quickly once it is available rather than to directly influence the low-level neural processes underlying odor perception.


2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Gerwig ◽  
H Guberina ◽  
A.C Eßer ◽  
A Floßdorf ◽  
B Schoch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document