Large area mapping of soil moisture using the ESTAR passive microwave radiometer in Washita'92

1995 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Jackson ◽  
David M. Le Vine ◽  
Calvin T. Swift ◽  
Thomas J. Schmugge ◽  
Frank R. Schiebe
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Zhao ◽  
Yijian Zeng ◽  
Bob Su ◽  
Jan Hofste

<p>Emission and backscattering at different frequencies have varied responses to soil physical processes (e.g., moisture redistribution, freeze-thaw) and vegetation growing/senescencing. Combing the use of active and passive microwave multi-frequency signals may provide complementary information, which can be used to better retrieve soil moisture, and vegetation biomass and water content for ecological applications. To this purpose, a Community Land Active Passive Microwave Radiative Transfer Modelling Platform (CLAP) was adopted in this study to simulate both emission (T<sub>B</sub>) and backscatter (σ<sup>0</sup>), in which the CLAP is backboned by the TorVergata model for modelling vegetation scattering, and an air-to-soil transition model (ATS) (accounting for surface dielectric roughness) integrated with the Advanced Integral Equation Model (AIEM) for modelling soil surface scattering. The accuracy of CLAP was assessed by both ground-based and spaceborne measurements, and the former was from the deployed microwave radiometer/scatterometer observatory at Maqu site on an alpine meadow over the Tibetan plateau. Specifically, for the passive case, simulated T<sub>B</sub> (emissivity multiplied by effective temperature) were compared to the ground-based ELBARA-III L-band observations, as well as C-band Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) and L-band Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) observations. For the active case, simulated σ<sup>0 </sup>were compared to the ground-based scatterometer C- and L-bands observations, and C-band Sentinel and L-band Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar 2 (PALSAR-2) observations. This study is expected to contribute to improving the soil moisture retrieval accuracy for dedicated microwave sensor configurations.</p>


2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 761-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. Piepmeier ◽  
Joel T. Johnson ◽  
Priscilla N. Mohammed ◽  
Damon Bradley ◽  
Christopher Ruf ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. K. Thapliyal ◽  
P. K. Pal ◽  
M. S. Narayanan ◽  
J. Srinivasan

Abstract Soil moisture is a very important boundary parameter in numerical weather prediction at different spatial and temporal scales. Satellite-based microwave radiometric observations are considered to be the best because of their high sensitivity to soil moisture, apart from possessing all-weather and day–night observation capabilities with high repetitousness. In the present study, 6.6-GHz horizontal-polarization brightness temperature data from the Multifrequency Scanning Microwave Radiometer (MSMR) onboard the Indian Remote Sensing Satellite IRS-P4 have been used for the estimation of large-area-averaged soil wetness. A methodology has been developed for the estimation of soil wetness for the period of June–July from the time series of MSMR brightness temperatures over India. Maximum and minimum brightness temperatures for each pixel are assigned to the driest and wettest periods, respectively. A daily soil wetness index over each pixel is computed by normalizing brightness temperature observations from these extreme values. This algorithm has the advantage that it takes into account the effect of time-invariant factors, such as vegetation, surface roughness, and soil characteristics, on soil wetness estimation. Weekly soil wetness maps compare well to corresponding weekly rainfall maps depicting clearly the regions of dry and wet soil conditions. Comparisons of MSMR-derived soil wetness with in situ observations show a high correlation (R > 0.75), with a standard error of the soil moisture estimate of less than 7% (volumetric unit) for the surface (0–5 cm) and subsurface (5–10 cm) soil moisture.


2015 ◽  
Vol 163 ◽  
pp. 127-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Hsu Su ◽  
Sugata Y. Narsey ◽  
Alexander Gruber ◽  
Angelika Xaver ◽  
Daniel Chung ◽  
...  

SIMULATION ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek M. Burrage ◽  
Mark A. Goodberlet ◽  
Malcolm L. Heron

2015 ◽  
Vol 120 (13) ◽  
pp. 6460-6479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt C. Kornelsen ◽  
Michael H. Cosh ◽  
Paulin Coulibaly

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document