Measuring service system coordination in managed mental health care for children and youth

1996 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Anne Heflinger
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 795-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence S. Wissow ◽  
Jonathan D. Brown ◽  
Robert J. Hilt ◽  
Barry D. Sarvet

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine M. Boydell ◽  
Raymond Pong ◽  
Tiziana Volpe ◽  
Kate Tilleczek ◽  
Elizabeth Wilson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 877-895
Author(s):  
Blanka Skrzypkowska-Brancewicz ◽  
Małgorzata Janas-Kozik ◽  
Marta Anczewska ◽  
Katarzyna Kucharska ◽  
Daria Biechowska ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 117863291982793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon L Stewart ◽  
Jeff W Poss ◽  
Elizabeth Thornley ◽  
John P Hirdes

Children’s mental health care plays a vital role in many social, health care, and education systems, but there is evidence that appropriate targeting strategies are needed to allocate limited mental health care resources effectively. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a methodology for identifying children who require access to more intense facility-based or community resources. Ontario data based on the interRAI Child and Youth Mental Health instruments were analysed to identify predictors of service complexity in children’s mental health. The Resource Intensity for Children and Youth (RIChY) algorithm was a good predictor of service complexity in the derivation sample. The algorithm was validated with additional data from 61 agencies. The RIChY algorithm provides a psychometrically sound decision-support tool that may be used to inform the choices related to allocation of children’s mental health resources and prioritisation of clients needing community- and facility-based resources.


2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ragnfrid Eline Kogstad ◽  
Jan Kaare Hummelvoll ◽  
Bengt G. Eriksson

Background: Clients have mixed experiences with mental health services. Historically there have been quite different and also incompatible approaches to treatment in mental health care. Some antagonisms may have been overcome, but clients’ experiences still seem to mirror approaches that are in contrast to each other. Aim: To describe different treatment approaches as clients experience them, discuss essential factors in, and differences between the approaches and the degree to which they appear corresponding or antagonistic. Method: Qualitative content analysis of stories from approximately 492 users dealing with positive, negative, or both positive and negative experiences with the health service system. Results: Clients experience different treatment cultures side by side within the mental health care system. The cultures exist on a continuum where monologue and dialogic cultures represent endpoints. Conclusion: It is important to acknowledge the contrasts clients have experienced between different treatment cultures. Realizing the contrast between approaches, it emerges as important that clients are given a choice and can get the kind of treatment they prefer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document