scholarly journals Sources of real exchange-rate fluctuations: How important are nominal shocks?

Author(s):  
Richard Clarida ◽  
Jordi Gali
Author(s):  
Amalia Morales-Zumaquero

This paper tries to analyze the sources of the real exchange rate fluctuations for a set of advanced economies and Central and Eastern European transition economies. To address this, in a first step, we compute two measures of the share of the variance of the real exchange rate accounted for movements in the relative prices of traded goods between the countries. One measure is based on R2 coefficient and the other one is based on the mean-squared error (MSE) of the changes in the real exchange rate. In a second step, we estimate structural (identified) vector autoregression (SVAR) models, and decompose real and nominal exchange rate movements into those caused by real and nominal shocks. In a third step, we complete previous ones with an impulse-response analysis. Three central messages are derived from results: (1) for transition economies, under regimes of managed nominal exchange rates, the relative price of non-traded goods explain a large percentage of the variance of the real exchange rate; (2) there is evidence of instability in the variance decomposition of the real exchange rates for advanced economies across samples, and (3) as result of diverse fiscal and monetary policies in transition economies, real exchange rates in some economies are driven mostly by real shocks while in others are driven mostly by nominal shocks.


Author(s):  
Doh-Khul Kim

<p class="MsoBodyText" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">According to a recent paper by Fisher and Huh (200</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;">2</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">), in contrast to a long-run neutrality hypothesis, nominal shocks have long-run effects on a country&rsquo;s real exchange rate</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;"> and trade balance.</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> However employing </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;">a </span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">similar method (VAR) with identical restrictions (</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;">long-run neutrality and </span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">short-run recursive</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;"> hypotheses</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">), </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;">this paper </span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">show</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;">s</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> that the effects on the real exchange rate are much shorter</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;"> in this G-7 country study</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> than what </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;">Fisher and Huh (2002) contend.</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> Further, the trade balance improves for a short period of time, from which </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;">it can</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> conclude there is a shorter existence of the depreciation effect in response to </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;">expansionary</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> monetary shocks, which supports the long-run neutrality hypothesis</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;"> in an open macroeconomic framework</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span></span></span></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document