Intraoperative assessment of wrist extensor muscle force

1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 832-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurel S. Mendelson ◽  
P. Hunter Peckham ◽  
Alvin A. Freehafer ◽  
Michael W. Keith
2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Di Domizio ◽  
Jeremy P.M. Mogk ◽  
Peter J. Keir

Wrist splints are commonly prescribed to limit wrist motion and provide support at night and during inactive periods but are often used in the workplace. In theory, splinting the wrist should reduce wrist extensor muscle activity by stabilizing the joint and reducing the need for co-contraction to maintain posture. Ten healthy volunteers underwent a series of 24 10-s gripping trials with surface electromyography on 6 forearm muscles. Trials were randomized between splinted and nonsplinted conditions with three wrist postures (30° flexion, neutral, and 30° extension) and four grip efforts. Custom-made Plexiglas splints were taped to the dorsum of the hand and wrist. It was found that when simply holding the dynamometer, use of a splint led to a small (<1% MVE) but significant reduction in activity for all flexor muscles and extensor carpi radialis (all activity <4% maximum). At maximal grip, extensor muscle activity was significantly increased with the splints by 7.9–23.9% MVE. These data indicate that splinting at low-to-moderate grip forces may act to support the wrist against external loading, but appears counterproductive when exerting maximal forces. Wrist bracing should be limited to periods of no to light activity and avoided during tasks that require heavy efforts.


2013 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 385-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. G. Bergin ◽  
Kylie J. Tucker ◽  
Bill Vicenzino ◽  
Wolbert van den Hoorn ◽  
Paul W. Hodges

Brain ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 1075-1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
DOUGLAS S. GOODIN ◽  
MICHAEL J. AMINOFF ◽  
PANG-YING SHIH

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 46-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Pranata ◽  
Luke Perraton ◽  
Doa El-Ansary ◽  
Ross Clark ◽  
Karine Fortin ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwon Ick Ha ◽  
Min Young Chung ◽  
Seong Ho Hahn ◽  
Sin Cheol Yu
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengyun Yu ◽  
Weining Wang ◽  
Sijie Liang ◽  
Ce Li ◽  
Shan Tian ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The present study was designed to investigate the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and peripheral magnetic stimulation (PMS) applied to the wrist extensor muscle on the cortical activity of healthy adults by using fNIRS. Methods: Fifteen healthy adult subjects (7 males, mean age: 27.13 ± 4.52 years) all received two different conditions of peripheral muscle stimulation in random order: (1) NMES and (2) PMS. The sessions were separated by at least 48 h as a washout period. During muscle stimulation, the motor evoked potential (MEP) of the left primary motor cortex (M1) was measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and the concentration of oxygenated (HbO) and deoxygenated (HbR) hemoglobin detected by fNIRS were used to evaluate the excitability and the activity of the cortex. Results: After the stimulation of the wrist extensor, the MEP amplitude in the left M1 area did not change in both conditions, and there was no difference between NMES and PMS condition. NMES reduced HbO values of several channels in the Prefrontal cortex (PFC), Somatosensory motor cortex (SMC) and Occipital cortex (OC), and HbR valus of several channels in the PFC and SMC. During the PMS stimulation period, the HbO value of all brain areas did not change significantly, while the HbR value of the SMC area decreased. The HbO and HbR value of the channels in the SMC did not differ between NMES and PMS. Inter-region of interest and inter-channel analysis between NMES and PMS showed no difference in functional connectivity. Conclusions: In the case of wrist extensor muscle stimulation, both NMES and PMS can induce cortical activation. PMS targeted to increases the activity of the contralateral SMC, while NMES increased contralateral SMC activity and negatively activated the PFC and OC.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian A. Mista ◽  
Silvio Laugero ◽  
Javier Adur ◽  
Ole K. Andersen ◽  
Jose Biurrun Manresa

Experimental models of pain in humans are crucial for understanding pain mechanisms. The most often used muscle pain models involve the injection of algesic substances, such as hypertonic saline solution or nerve growth factor, or exercise-induced delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). However, these models are either invasive or take substantial time to develop, and the elicited level of pain/soreness is difficult to control. To overcome these shortcomings, we propose to elicit muscle pain by a localized application of short-wave diathermy (SWD). In this crossover study, SWD was administered to eighteen healthy volunteers to the wrist extensor muscle group, with a constant stimulation intensity and up to 4 minutes. We measured pressure pain threshold (PPT) and pinprick sensitivity (PPS) and performed a psychophysical evaluation of muscle soreness at baseline and at 0, 30 and 60 minutes. SWD evoked localized muscle pain/soreness in the wrist extensor muscle group and a decrease of PPT in the treated arm compared with the control arm that lasted for at least 60 minutes, reflecting ongoing hyperalgesia after SWD application. PPS was not significantly altered 30 to 60 min following SWD, suggesting a minimal contribution from skin tissue to sustained hyperalgesia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document