The assessment and management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia in perspective

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (S1) ◽  
pp. 3s-5s ◽  
Author(s):  
HY Meltzer ◽  
H Hippius

SummaryConsensus was reached on the five following points: (1) “Treatment resistance” is a term which is widely used, but not adequately defined. In particular, definitions of “responders” and “non-responders” need to be more precise. (2) There is a need to extend the assessment of the results of treatment to include factors such as quality of life and the subjective evaluation by the patient and relatives. (3) Clozapine (Clozaril®/Leponex®) has become the standard for atypical antipsychotic drugs. The adjective “atypical” is not an exact descriptor. The vague nature of the term leads to confusion with other drugs that are putative atypical antipsychotic agents but have different properties. D2 dopamine receptor antagonism is the single factor common to all antipsychotic drugs. Antagonism at a specific D2-like receptor may underlie the atypical antipsychotic actions of clozapine. Drugs described as being atypical antipsychotics share a relatively low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects. (4) Clozapine is the only drug that produces antipsychotic (therapeutic) effects at doses that do not result, in significant extrapyramidal side effects. This may be due to the fact that antipsychotic efficacy is obtained with clozapine in doses that result in significantly less striatal D2 occupancy. Other factors including concomitant 5-HT2 antagonism, may contribute to the lack of motor side effects observed with clozapine treatment. (5) Clozapine is the only drug currently well proven in therapy-resistant schizophrenia, and there is a case for its earlier use in patients who can be anticipated to become therapy resistant. Other antipsychotic therapies remain unproven in this group of patients.

1996 ◽  
Vol 168 (S29) ◽  
pp. 45-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven R. Hirsch ◽  
Christopher G. G. Link ◽  
Jeffrey M. Goldstein ◽  
Lisa A. Arvanitis

The therapeutic effects of ‘classic’ (typical) antipsychotic agents lie in their ability to block central dopaminergic receptors – a property that is also responsible for the frequent occurrence of undesirable extrapyramidal side-effects (EPS). In contrast to these typical agents, clozapine alone has distinguished itself in humans – by virtue of its enhanced antipsychotic action and lack of concurrent EPS – as an atypical antipsychotic. However, the use of clozapine has been limited by the occurrence of agranulocytosis and, to a lesser extent, seizures (Alvir et al, 1993; Haring et al, 1994). The mechanism underpinning the atypical profile of clozapine remains elusive. One hypothesis suggests that it lies in clozapine's higher serotonin 5-HT2: D2 binding ratio, when compared with typical agents – a factor being considered as a predictor of atypicality (Meltzer, this issue; Meltzer et al, 1989). However, an emerging view is that it is not a single pharmacological action, but rather multiple properties that may define an atypical, clozapine-like compound (Lieberman, 1993).


2002 ◽  
Vol 180 (06) ◽  
pp. 485-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Hamish McAllister-Williams ◽  
I. Nicol Ferrier

BackgroundWhen parenteral treatments are indicated for acutely disturbed behaviour, previous guidelines have recommended droperidol or haloperidol in combination with benzodiazepines. However, there has been recent concern over cardiotoxicity and sudden death associated with some antipsychotic medication and droperidol has now been withdrawn.AimsTo ascertain what alternatives can be recommended to replace intramuscular droperidol.MethodSelective review of current guidelines and the literature pertaining to rapid parenteral tranquillisation.ResultsCurrent guidelines recommend haloperidol as an alternative to droperidol. There is evidence of cardiotoxicity with haloperidol and it has a propensity to cause extrapyramidal side effects that may exacerbate disturbed behaviour and reduce longer-term compliance. The rapid-acting intramuscular formulations of atypical antipsychotic agents show promise.ConclusionsIt is recommended that the mainstay of pharmacological rapid tranquillisation should be parenteral benzodiazepines used with due care.


1999 ◽  
Vol 174 (S38) ◽  
pp. 52-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. E. Stephenson ◽  
L. S. Pilowsky

The development of atypical antipsychotics has revolutionised the treatment of schizophrenia, as well as providing new insights into its cause. The archetypal atypical antipsychotic is clozapine, which has therapeutic advantages over traditional antipsychotics, as well as a low potential for producing extrapyramidal side-effects (EPS) (Kane et al, 1988). However, clozapine causes agranulocytosis in 1% of patients, and there has consequently been a search for novel atypical antipsychotics, as efficacious as clozapine, but without the need for intensive blood monitoring. There has been much discussion of the definition and characteristics of an atypical antipsychotic drug, and an operational understanding seems to have been agreed upon, that atypical drugs have therapeutic efficacy in treating schizophrenia, without producing EPS (Deutch et al, 1991; Kerwin, 1994).


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 553-556
Author(s):  
HARVEY S. SINGER

Antipsychotic drugs, such as the phenothiazines (chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, thioridazine), butyrophenones (haloperiodol), and diphenylbutylpiperidines (pimozide) are used in children and adolescents to treat a variety of clinical entities including psychoses, tics, behavior disorders, and movement problems. Because virtually all of these drugs have a potential to affect body movements and posture, they have also been termed neuroleptics.1 Most physicians are aware of the more common acute extrapyramidal side effects of these drugs, such as oculogyria, pseudoparkinsonism, dystonia, and restlessness (akathisia). Despite the widespread use of neuroleptics, however, little is known about the long-term neurologic consequences of such treatment. Of particular concern, based originally on data in adults, is the risk of severe and persistent tardive dyskinesia developing in persons receiving neuroleptic therapy.


Therapy ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Chang ◽  
Joseph H Friedman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document