PS-36-10 Neuromonitoring in experimental model of clip compression on the spinal nerve root to characterize the acute nerve root injury

Author(s):  
I-Ming Jou ◽  
Rucy-Mo Lin ◽  
Kuo-An Lai ◽  
Hideo Matsuda
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (25) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shota Tamagawa ◽  
Takatoshi Okuda ◽  
Hidetoshi Nojiri ◽  
Rei Momomura ◽  
Muneaki Ishijima

BACKGROUND Although malpositioning of pedicle screws into the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen can cause spinal nerve root injuries, there are few reports of L5 nerve root injuries when S1 pedicle screws have been inserted anterolaterally. The authors report two cases of L5 nerve root injury caused by anterolateral malpositioning of loosened S1 pedicle screws. OBSERVATIONS In both patients, S1 pedicle screws were inserted toward the outside of the S1 anterior foramen, and the tip of the screws perforated the anterior sacral cortex. L5 nerve root impairment was not observed immediately after surgery. However, severe leg pain in the L5 area was observed after the S1 pedicle screws became loosened. In case 1, the symptoms could not be controlled with conservative treatment. Reoperation was performed 3 months after the initial surgery. In case 2, the symptoms gradually improved with conservative treatment because the area around the loosened S1 screw was surrounded by newly formed bone that stabilized the screws, as observed with computed tomography 1 year after surgery. LESSONS Surgeons should recognize that anterolateral malpositioning of S1 pedicle screws can cause L5 nerve root injury. The screws should be inserted in the correct direction without loosening.


1990 ◽  
Vol 1 (3,4) ◽  
pp. 289-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Carlstedt ◽  
M. Risling ◽  
H. Lindå ◽  
S. Cullheim ◽  
B. Ulfhake ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (17) ◽  
pp. 1862-1868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Cornefjord ◽  
Fred Nyberg ◽  
Lars Rosengren ◽  
Helena Brisby

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham

Abstract The AMAGuides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, does not provide a separate mechanism for rating spinal nerve injuries as extremity impairment; radiculopathy was reflected in the spinal rating process in Chapter 17, The Spine and Pelvis. Certain jurisdictions, such as the Federal Employee Compensation Act (FECA), rate nerve root injury as impairment involving the extremities rather than as part of the spine. This article presents an approach to rate spinal nerve impairments consistent with the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, methodology. This approach should be used only when a jurisdiction requires ratings for extremities and precludes rating for the spine. A table in this article compares sensory and motor deficits according to the AMA Guides, Sixth and Fifth Editions; evaluators should be aware of changes between editions in methodology used to assign the final impairment. The authors present two tables regarding spinal nerve impairment: one for the upper extremities and one for the lower extremities. Both tables were developed using the methodology defined in the sixth edition. Using these tables and the process defined in the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, evaluators can rate spinal nerve impairments for jurisdictions that do not permit rating for the spine and require rating for radiculopathy as an extremity impairment.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 514-519
Author(s):  
Mary Ann Sens ◽  
Sarah E. Meyers ◽  
Mark A. Koponen ◽  
Arne H. Graff ◽  
Ryan D. Reynolds ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document