STUDY OF STABILITY AND SELF-OSCILLATIONS IN NON-LINEAR AUTOMATIC REGULATION SYSTEMS

Author(s):  
E.P. POPOV
Author(s):  
Pierre-Yves Couzon ◽  
Johan Der Hagopian ◽  
Luc Gaudiller

The abilities of neural networks combined with fuzzy logic offer interesting prospects for the active control of structures. By identification, they permit discarding the often delicate modeling step and they also permit the automatic regulation of the controllers that have non-linear characteristics. This study describes the application of neuro-fuzzy control to the dynamic behavior of structures. The study first explains the process chosen, which consists of two parts: • the first part is essential for the adjustment of the associated controller and concerns the neural identification of the structure studied; • the second part describes the controller development and the training stage; the controller is based on the simplest neural network model possible. This network is also able to translate Sugeno’s fuzzy function and optimize its performances according to a reference response. The study then presents two applications: the first deals with the identification and control of a linear mechanical system with two degrees of freedom. The second deals with the identification and control of the non-linear dynamic behavior of active electromagnetic actuators along one acting axis. In both cases, the results show the abilities and the efficiency of this process and underline the main advantage of this type of controller operating even on in a strongly non-linear system.


1967 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 105-176
Author(s):  
Robert F. Christy

(Ed. note: The custom in these Symposia has been to have a summary-introductory presentation which lasts about 1 to 1.5 hours, during which discussion from the floor is minor and usually directed at technical clarification. The remainder of the session is then devoted to discussion of the whole subject, oriented around the summary-introduction. The preceding session, I-A, at Nice, followed this pattern. Christy suggested that we might experiment in his presentation with a much more informal approach, allowing considerable discussion of the points raised in the summary-introduction during its presentation, with perhaps the entire morning spent in this way, reserving the afternoon session for discussion only. At Varenna, in the Fourth Symposium, several of the summaryintroductory papers presented from the astronomical viewpoint had been so full of concepts unfamiliar to a number of the aerodynamicists-physicists present, that a major part of the following discussion session had been devoted to simply clarifying concepts and then repeating a considerable amount of what had been summarized. So, always looking for alternatives which help to increase the understanding between the different disciplines by introducing clarification of concept as expeditiously as possible, we tried Christy's suggestion. Thus you will find the pattern of the following different from that in session I-A. I am much indebted to Christy for extensive collaboration in editing the resulting combined presentation and discussion. As always, however, I have taken upon myself the responsibility for the final editing, and so all shortcomings are on my head.)


Optimization ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 549-559
Author(s):  
L. Gerencsér

1979 ◽  
Author(s):  
George W. Howe ◽  
James H. Dalton ◽  
Maurice J. Elias
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document