Current Next-Generation Sequencing–Based Companion Diagnostics and Their Analytical Validation

Author(s):  
Saumya Pant ◽  
George A. Green ◽  
Manjunath Ramarao ◽  
Michael C. Montalto
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey M. Conroy ◽  
Sarabjot Pabla ◽  
Sean T. Glenn ◽  
Blake Burgher ◽  
Mary Nesline ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 120 (1-2) ◽  
pp. S26
Author(s):  
Soumeya Bekri ◽  
Bénédicte Sudrié-Arnaud ◽  
Françoise Charbonnier ◽  
Hélène Dranguet ◽  
Sophie Coutant ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kikuya Kato ◽  
Jiro Okami ◽  
Harumi Nakamura ◽  
Keiichiro Honma ◽  
Yoshiharu Sato ◽  
...  

Companion diagnostics, which predict the efficacy of molecular targeted agents based on genetic information, are indispensable for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma. Recent increase in the number of molecular targeted agents and the corresponding target genes have led to the demand for the simultaneous testing of multiple genes. Although gene panels using next-generation sequencing (NGS panels) are ideal for this purpose, conventional panels require high tumor content, and biopsy samples often do not meet this requirement. We developed a new NGS panel called a compact panel, to accommodate biopsy samples without the restriction of tumor content. The compact panel is characterized by high sensitivity, with detection limits for mutations of 0.14%, 0.20%, 0.48%, 0.24%, and 0.20% for EGFR exon 19 deletion, L858R, T790M, BRAF V600E, and KRAS G12C, respectively. Mutation detection also has a high quantitative ability, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.966 to 0.992. The panel detected fusions in samples whose tumor cell content was as low as 1%. The compact panel exhibited good concordance with approved tests as follows: EGFR positive, 100.0 (95% confidence interval 95.5-100); EGFR negative, 90.9 (82.2-96.3); ALK positive, 96.7 (83.8-99.9); ALK negative, 98.4 (97.2-99.2); ROS1 positive, 100 (66.4-100); ROS1 negative, 99.0 (97.1-99.2); MET positive, 98.0 (89.0-100); MET negative 100 (92.8-100). The analytical performance demonstrated that the compact panel can handle various types of biopsy samples obtained by routine clinical practice, without requiring strict pathological monitoring like in case of conventional NGS panels.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e0243683
Author(s):  
Sun Hee Rosenthal ◽  
Anna Gerasimova ◽  
Charles Ma ◽  
Hai-Rong Li ◽  
Andrew Grupe ◽  
...  

Identification of genomic mutations by molecular testing plays an important role in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of myeloid neoplasms. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an efficient method for simultaneous detection of clinically significant genomic mutations with high sensitivity. Various NGS based in-house developed and commercial myeloid neoplasm panels have been integrated into routine clinical practice. However, some genes frequently mutated in myeloid malignancies are particularly difficult to sequence with NGS panels (e.g., CEBPA, CARL, and FLT3). We report development and validation of a 48-gene NGS panel that includes genes that are technically challenging for molecular profiling of myeloid neoplasms including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Target regions were captured by hybridization with complementary biotinylated DNA baits, and NGS was performed on an Illumina NextSeq500 instrument. A bioinformatics pipeline that was developed in-house was used to detect single nucleotide variations (SNVs), insertions/deletions (indels), and FLT3 internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD). An analytical validation study was performed on 184 unique specimens for variants with allele frequencies ≥5%. Variants identified by the 48-gene panel were compared to those identified by a 35-gene hematologic neoplasms panel using an additional 137 unique specimens. The developed assay was applied to a large cohort (n = 2,053) of patients with suspected myeloid neoplasms. Analytical validation yielded 99.6% sensitivity (95% CI: 98.9–99.9%) and 100% specificity (95% CI: 100%). Concordance of variants detected by the 2 tested panels was 100%. Among patients with suspected myeloid neoplasms (n = 2,053), 54.5% patients harbored at least one clinically significant mutation: 77% in AML patients, 48% in MDS, and 45% in MPN. Together, these findings demonstrate that the assay can identify mutations associated with diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment options of myeloid neoplasms even in technically challenging genes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (9) ◽  
pp. 1156-1166 ◽  
Author(s):  
James H Godsey ◽  
Angela Silvestro ◽  
J Carl Barrett ◽  
Kelli Bramlett ◽  
Darya Chudova ◽  
...  

Abstract Liquid biopsy, particularly the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), has demonstrated considerable promise for numerous clinical intended uses. Successful validation and commercialization of novel ctDNA tests have the potential to improve the outcomes of patients with cancer. The goal of the Blood Profiling Atlas Consortium (BloodPAC) is to accelerate the development and validation of liquid biopsy assays that will be introduced into the clinic. To accomplish this goal, the BloodPAC conducts research in the following areas: Data Collection and Analysis within the BloodPAC Data Commons; Preanalytical Variables; Analytical Variables; Patient Context Variables; and Reimbursement. In this document, the BloodPAC’s Analytical Variables Working Group (AV WG) attempts to define a set of generic analytical validation protocols tailored for ctDNA-based Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) assays. Analytical validation of ctDNA assays poses several unique challenges that primarily arise from the fact that very few tumor-derived DNA molecules may be present in circulation relative to the amount of nontumor-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA). These challenges include the exquisite level of sensitivity and specificity needed to detect ctDNA, the potential for false negatives in detecting these rare molecules, and the increased reliance on contrived samples to attain sufficient ctDNA for analytical validation. By addressing these unique challenges, the BloodPAC hopes to expedite sponsors’ presubmission discussions with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with the protocols presented herein. By sharing best practices with the broader community, this work may also save the time and capacity of FDA reviewers through increased efficiency.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document