Educational Foundations of Instructional Design Applied to Simulation-Based Education

2019 ◽  
pp. 185-206
Author(s):  
Guillaume Der Sahakian ◽  
Clément Buléon ◽  
Guillaume Alinier
2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. e867-e898 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Cook ◽  
Stanley J. Hamstra ◽  
Ryan Brydges ◽  
Benjamin Zendejas ◽  
Jason H. Szostek ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Antonia Cornelia van Tetering ◽  
Maartje Henrica Martine Segers ◽  
Peter Ntuyo ◽  
Imelda Namagambe ◽  
M Beatrijs van der Hout-van der Jagt ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Simulation-based training is a common strategy for improving the quality of facility-based maternity services and is often evaluated using Kirkpatrick’s theoretical model. The results on the Kirkpatrick’s levels are closely related to the quality of the instructional design of a training program. The instructional design is generally considered as the ‘set of prescriptions for teaching methods to improve the quality of instruction with a goal of optimizing learning outcomes’. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to evaluate the instructional design of a technology-enhanced simulation-based training in obstetrics, the reaction of participants, and the effect on knowledge, teamwork, and skills in a low-income country. METHODS A stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial was performed in a University Hospital in Kampala, Uganda, with an annual delivery rate of over 31,000. In November 2014 a medical simulation center was installed with a full body birthing simulator (Noelle® S550, Gaumard, Miami), an interactive neonate (new-born Simon® S102, Gaumard, Miami) and an audio- and video recording system. Twelve local obstetricians were trained and certified as medical simulation trainer. From 2014 to 2016 training was provided to 57 residents in groups of six to nine students. Descriptive statistics were calculated for ten instructional design features of the training course measured by the 42-item ID-SIM. Wilcoxon signed rank test was conducted to investigate the difference in scores on knowledge, the clinical teamwork scale, and medical technical skills. RESULTS The mean scores on the ten instructional design features differed between 54.9 (95%CI 48.5 – 61.3) and 84.3 (95%CI 80.9-87.6) out of 100. The highest mean score was given on the feature feedback and the lowest scores on repetitive practice and controlled environment. The overall score for the training day was rated 92.8 out of 100 (95%CI 89.5 – 96.1). Knowledge improved significantly with a test score of 63.4 (95%CI 60.7 – 66.1) percent before and 78.9 (95%CI 76.8 – 81.1) percent after the training (P<.001). The overall score of the clinical teamwork scale, scored on a 10-point scale, was 6.0 (95%CI 4.4 – 7.6) before, and 5.9 (95%CI 4.5 – 7.2) after the training (P=.78). Medical technical skills were scored 55.5% (95%CI 47.2 – 63.8) before and 65.6% (95%CI 56.5 – 74.7) after training (P=.08). CONCLUSIONS Most instructional design features of a technology-enhanced simulation-based training in obstetrics in a low-income country were scored high, although intervals were large. The overall score for the training day was high, knowledge did improve after the training program, but no changes in teamwork and (most) medical technical skills were found. The lowest scored instructional design features may be improved to achieve further learning aims. CLINICALTRIAL ISRCTN98617255, retrospectively registered


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemarie F Fransen ◽  
M Beatrijs van der Hout-van der Jagt ◽  
Roxane Gardner ◽  
Manuela Capelle ◽  
Sebastiaan P Oei ◽  
...  

IntroductionTo achieve an expert performance of care teams, adequate simulation-based team training courses with an effective instructional design are essential. As the importance of the instructional design becomes ever more clear, an objective assessment tool would be valuable for educators and researchers. Therefore, we aimed to develop an evidence-based and objective assessment tool for the evaluation of the instructional design of simulation-based team training courses.MethodsA validation study in which we developed an assessment tool containing an evidence-based questionnaire with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a visual chart directly translating the results of the questionnaire. Psychometric properties of the assessment tool were tested using five descriptions of simulation-based team training courses. An expert-opinion-based ranking from poor to excellent was obtained. Ten independent raters assessed the five training courses twice, by using the developed questionnaire with an interval of 2 weeks. Validity and reliability analyses were performed by using the scores from the raters and comparing them with the expert’s ranking. Usability was assessed by an 11-item survey.ResultsA 42-item questionnaire, using VAS, and a propeller chart were developed. The correlation between the expert-opinion-based ranking and the evaluators’ scores (Spearman correlation) was 0.95, and the variance due to subjectivity of raters was 3.5% (VTraining*Rater). The G-coefficient was 0.96. The inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)) was 0.91 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.99), and intra-rater reliability for the overall score (ICC) was ranging from 0.91 to 0.99.ConclusionsWe developed an evidence-based and reliable assessment tool for the evaluation of the instructional design of a simulation-based team training: the ID-SIM. The ID-SIM is available as a free mobile application.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 284-288
Author(s):  
Anne A C van Tetering ◽  
Annemarie F Fransen ◽  
M Beatrijs van der Hout-van der Jagt ◽  
S Guid Oei

ObjectiveThis study compares satisfaction levels from multiprofessional obstetric care teams about simulation-based obstetric team training courses with and without the instructional design feature repetitive practice.MethodsThe present study is part of a multicentre cluster-randomised controlled trial (TOSTI trial) that investigated the effectiveness of a 1 day, multiprofessional, simulation-based obstetric team training. The initial training group received a training which was designed based on best practice. After 1 year, the control group received a training course in which the instructional design was changed by providing repetitive practice. All participants were asked to fill in a 29-item evaluation form with seven questions about baseline characteristics and 22 questions about training features. The questions about training features could be rated on a scale of 1 to 5. Finally, all participants were asked to rate the total training day on a scale of 1–10.ResultsThe best practice group consisted of 471 trainees and the repetitive practice group of 549, including gynaecologists, residents, midwives and nurses. The best practice group rated the total training day significantly higher than the repetitive practice group (mean 8.8, SD 0.6 and mean 8.7, SD 0.6; p<0.003, Cohen’s d=0.19). Several training features were also scored higher in the best practice group.ConclusionThis study showed that obstetric healthcare professionals rated a simulation-based obstetric team training course, with and without repetition of scenarios, both high. The training without the repetitive elements gained higher scores for the total training dayand several, and several training features were scored higher. The difference between the mean scores and the effect sizes for the training features were small. This implies that repetitive practice can be integrated in simulation-based team training to optimise learning effects, with small effects on trainees satisfaction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document