2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (23) ◽  
pp. 23268-23278
Author(s):  
Georgina Rózsa ◽  
Ákos Fazekas ◽  
Máté Náfrádi ◽  
Tünde Alapi ◽  
Krisztina Schrantz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saloua Tiar ◽  
Erismar Rubio ◽  
Abobaker Albelazi ◽  
Azubuike Ofodile ◽  
Fouad Abdulsallam ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. S366
Author(s):  
H.A. Welp ◽  
A.M. Dell'Aquila ◽  
A. Hoffmeier ◽  
S. Martens ◽  
M. Scherer

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathanial Cahill ◽  
Michael Popp ◽  
Charles West ◽  
Alexandre Rocateli ◽  
Amanda Ashworth ◽  
...  

This article analyzes economic tradeoffs among harvest date, fertilizer applied, nutrient removal, and switchgrass yield as they vary with respect to input and output prices. Economic sensitivity analyses suggest that higher biomass prices lead to earlier harvest. Optimal harvest time occurs beyond time of maximum yield because nutrient removal in the biomass is an important economic consideration. Switchgrass price premia that reflect the cost of non-optimal harvest time are driven by standing crop yield loss, nutrient removal, storage loss, and opportunity cost. These price premia could provide a mechanism to compensate producers for alternative harvest times and aid with logistics management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document