Differential diagnosis of narrow-QRS (≤120 ms) tachycardias

Author(s):  
Demosthenes G Katritsis ◽  
Fred Morady
2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 200-204
Author(s):  
Lívia Teixeira Martins e Silva ◽  
Paula Damasco do Vale ◽  
Jairo Macedo da Rocha ◽  
Carla Septimio Margalho ◽  
Henrique César de Almeida Maia

A 16-year-old female patient was hospitalized due to narrow QRS tachycardia suggestive of fascicular ventricular tachycardia. Initially, the differential diagnosis with supraventricular tachycardia can be challenging. The tachyarrhythmia is well controlled with medication, but electrophysiological study and ablation may be necessary in patients who remain symptomatic.


Heart Rhythm ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1667-1676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Demosthenes G. Katritsis ◽  
Mark E. Josephson

1984 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 555-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frits W. Bär ◽  
Pedro Brugada ◽  
Willem R.M. Dassen ◽  
Hein J.J. Wellens

Author(s):  
Yong-Mei Cha ◽  
Samuel J. Asirvatham

Among the most difficult set of arrhythmias to analyze, diagnose, and treat appropriately in the electrophysiology laboratory are wide QRS tachycardias. The reasons for this difficulty include the relatively rare occurrence of some of these conditions and the fact that the differential diagnosis for a wide QRS rhythm includes all the possibilities for a narrow QRS rhythm and, in addition, arrhythmias related to antegrade pathway conduction and ventricular tachycardia. This wide range of possibilities can be confusing even to experienced electrophysiologists, and a complex case may lead to inappropriate diagnoses and maneuvers, including a wrong ablation sequence. This chapter focuses on the overall approach to wide QRS tachycardias. A brief description of the clinical and electrocardiographic features is followed by an in-depth discussion of diagnostic maneuvers and approaches in the electrophysiology laboratory. Finally, representative electrograms and case studies follow to illustrate some of the more involved principles discussed in this chapter.


Author(s):  
Jian-hua Yu ◽  
Ping Yu ◽  
Yong Jiang ◽  
Kui Hong ◽  
Gan-Xin Yan

Medicine ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 94 (51) ◽  
pp. e2310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karol Deutsch ◽  
Sebastian Stec ◽  
Piotr Kukla ◽  
Aleksandra Morka ◽  
Marek Jastrzebski ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Bruce Mackay

The broadest application of transmission electron microscopy (EM) in diagnostic medicine is the identification of tumors that cannot be classified by routine light microscopy. EM is useful in the evaluation of approximately 10% of human neoplasms, but the extent of its contribution varies considerably. It may provide a specific diagnosis that can not be reached by other means, but in contrast, the information obtained from ultrastructural study of some 10% of tumors does not significantly add to that available from light microscopy. Most cases fall somewhere between these two extremes: EM may correct a light microscopic diagnosis, or serve to narrow a differential diagnosis by excluding some of the possibilities considered by light microscopy. It is particularly important to correlate the EM findings with data from light microscopy, clinical examination, and other diagnostic procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document