Spatio-temporal dynamics of synaptic integration in cat visual cortical receptive fields

Brain Theory ◽  
1996 ◽  
pp. 143-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yves Frégnac ◽  
Vincent Bringuier
1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 2882-2892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher I. Moore ◽  
Sacha B. Nelson

Moore, Christopher I. and Sacha B. Nelson. Spatio-temporal subthreshold receptive fields in the vibrissa representation of rat primary somatosensory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2882–2892, 1998. Whole cell recordings of synaptic responses evoked by deflection of individual vibrissa were obtained from neurons within adult rat primary somatosensory cortex. To define the spatial and temporal properties of subthreshold receptive fields, the spread, amplitude, latency to onset, rise time to half peak amplitude, and the balance of excitation and inhibition of subthreshold input were quantified. The convergence of information onto single neurons was found to be extensive: inputs were consistently evoked by vibrissa one- and two-away from the vibrissa that evoked the largest response (the “primary vibrissa”). Latency to onset, rise time, and the incidence and strength of inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) varied as a function of position within the receptive field and the strength of evoked excitatory input. Nonprimary vibrissae evoked smaller amplitude subthreshold responses [primary vibrissa, 9.1 ± 0.84 (SE) mV, n = 14; 1-away, 5.1 ± 0.5 mV, n = 38; 2-away, 3.7 ± 0.59 mV, n = 22; 3-away, 1.3 ± 0.70 mV, n = 8] with longer latencies (primary vibrissa, 10.8 ± 0.80 ms; 1-away, 15.0 ± 1.2 ms; 2-away, 15.7 ± 2.0 ms). Rise times were significantly faster for inputs that could evoke action potential responses (suprathreshold, 4.1 ± 1.3 ms, n = 8; subthreshold, 12.4 ± 1.5 ms, n = 61). In a subset of cells, sensory evoked IPSPs were examined by deflecting vibrissa during injection of hyperpolarizing and depolarizing current. The strongest IPSPs were evoked by the primary vibrissa ( n = 5/5), but smaller IPSPs also were evoked by nonprimary vibrissae ( n = 8/13). Inhibition peaked by 10–20 ms after the onset of the fastest excitatory input to the cortex. This pattern of inhibitory activity led to a functional reversal of the center of the receptive field and to suppression of later-arriving and slower-rising nonprimary inputs. Together, these data demonstrate that subthreshold receptive fields are on average large, and the spatio-temporal dynamics of these receptive fields vary as a function of position within the receptive field and strength of excitatory input. These findings constrain models of suprathreshold receptive field generation, multivibrissa interactions, and cortical plasticity.


1976 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 1131-IN5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lamberto Maffei ◽  
Adriana Fiorentini

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose-Manuel Alonso ◽  
Harvey A. Swadlow

A persistent and fundamental question in sensory cortical physiology concerns the manner in which receptive fields of layer-4 neurons are synthesized from their thalamic inputs. According to a hierarchical model proposed more than 40 years ago, simple receptive fields in layer 4 of primary visual cortex originate from the convergence of highly specific thalamocortical inputs (e.g., geniculate inputs with on-center receptive fields overlap the on subregions of layer 4 simple cells). Here, we summarize studies in the visual cortex that provide support for this high specificity of thalamic input to visual cortical simple cells. In addition, we review studies of GABAergic interneurons in the somatosensory “barrel” cortex with receptive fields that are generated by a very different mechanism: the nonspecific convergence of thalamic inputs with different response properties. We hypothesize that these 2 modes of thalamocortical connectivity onto subpopulations of excitatory and inhibitory neurons constitute a general feature of sensory neocortex and account for much of the diversity seen in layer-4 receptive fields.


2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith A. Hirsch ◽  
Luis M. Martinez

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Puntiroli ◽  
Heiner Deubel ◽  
Martin Szinte

SummaryWhen preparing a saccade, attentional resources are focused at the saccade target and its immediate vicinity. Here we show that this does not hold true when saccades are prepared towards a recently extinguished target. We obtained detailed maps of orientation sensitivity when participants prepared a saccade toward a target that either remained on the screen or disappeared before the eyes moved. We found that attention was mainly focused at the immediate surround of the visible target and increasingly spread to more peripheral locations as a function of the delay between the target’s disappearance and the saccade. Interestingly, this spread was accompanied by an overall increase in sensitivity, speaking against a dilution of limited resources over a larger spatial area. We hypothesize that these results reflect the behavioral consequences of the spatio-temporal dynamics of visual receptive fields in the presence and in the absence a structured visual cue.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ifedayo-EmmanuEL Adeyefa-Olasupo ◽  
Zixuan Xiao ◽  
Anirvan S. Nandy

ABSTRACTSaccadic eye-movements allow us to bring visual objects of interest to high-acuity central vision. Although saccades cause large displacements of retinal images, our percept of the visual world remains stable. Predictive remapping — the ability of cells in retinotopic brain areas to transiently exhibit spatio-temporal retinotopic shifts beyond the spatial extent of their classical receptive fields — has been proposed as a primary mechanism that mediates this seamless visual percept. Despite the well documented effects of predictive remapping, no study to date has been able to provide a mechanistic account of the neural computations and architecture that actively mediate this ubiquitous phenomenon. Borne out by the spatio-temporal dynamics of peri-saccadic sensitivity to probe stimuli in human subjects, we propose a novel neurobiologically inspired phenomenological model in which the underlying peri-saccadic attentional and oculomotor signals manifest as three temporally overlapping forces that act on retinotopic brain areas. These three forces – a compressive one toward the center of gaze, a convergent one toward the saccade target and a translational one parallel to the saccade trajectory – act in an inverse force field and specify the spatio-temporal window of predictive remapping of population receptive fields.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document