Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases

2011 ◽  
pp. 298-300
Author(s):  
Michael A. Choti
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (10) ◽  

Introduction: Radical liver resection is the only method for the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM); however, only 20–30% of patients with CLMs can be radically treated. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the possible methods of palliative treatment in such patients. Methods: RFA was performed in 381 patients with CLMs between 01 Jan 2001 and 31 Dec 2018. The mean age of the patients was 65.2±8.7 years. The male to female ratio was 2:1. Open laparotomy was done in 238 (62.5%) patients and the CT-navigated transcutaneous approach was used in 143 (37.5%) patients. CLMs <5 cm (usually <3 cm) in diameter were the indication for RFA. We used RFA as the only method in 334 (87.6%) patients; RFA in combination with resection was used in 36 (9.4%), and with multi-stage resection in 11 (3%) patients. We performed RFA in a solitary CLM in 170 (44.6%) patients, and in 2−5 CLMs in 211 (55.6%) patients. We performed computed tomography in each patient 48 hours after procedure. Results: The 30-day postoperative mortality was zero. Complications were present in 4.8% of transcutaneous and in 14.2% of open procedures, respectively, in the 30-day postoperative period. One-, 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 94.8, 66.8, 43.9 and 16.6%, respectively, in patients undergoing RFA, and 90.6, 69.1, 52.8 and 39.2%, respectively, in patients with liver resections. Disease free survival was 63.2, 30.1, 18.4 and 13.1%, respectively, in the same patients after RFA, and 71.1, 33.3, 22.8 and 15.5%, respectively, after liver resections. Conclusion: RFA is a palliative thermal ablation method, which is one of therapeutic options in patients with radically non-resectable CLMs. RFA is useful especially in a non-resectable, or resectable (but for the price of large liver resection) solitary CLM <3 cm in diameter and in CLM relapses. RFA is also part of multi-stage liver procedures.


2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 930-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reto Bale ◽  
Gerlig Widmann ◽  
Peter Schullian ◽  
Marion Haidu ◽  
Georg Pall ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. S355-S356
Author(s):  
B.G. Sibinga Mulder ◽  
P. Hendriks ◽  
T.R. Baetens ◽  
A. van Erkel ◽  
C.J.H. van de Velde ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. e724-e725
Author(s):  
J. Skipworth ◽  
C. Hadjittofi ◽  
G. Spoletini ◽  
D. Tamburrino ◽  
N. Davies ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (12) ◽  
pp. 1913-1923
Author(s):  
Li Long ◽  
Li Wei ◽  
Wu Hong

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the long-term prognosis of patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing liver resection (LR) with or without radiofrequency ablation (RFA). A systematic search was performed using both medical subject headings and truncated word searches to identify all comparative studies published on this topic. The primary outcomes were postoperative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. A total of 10 studies which included 3900 patients were finally enrolled in the meta-analysis. Patients treated by LR gained better OS (HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.82–2.37) and DFS (HR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.70–2.15) than those patients treated by LR 1 RFA, after pooling unadjusted HRs from the 10 studies. Five studies provided the data of adjusted HR. The pooled results showed that patients in the LR 1 RFA group had shorter OS (HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.18–2.32, P = 0.004) but similar DFS (HR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.99–1.88) compared with patients in the LR group. Our meta-analysis showed that colorectal liver metastases patients who underwent LR gained better long-term outcomes compared with patients undergoing LR 1 RFA. However, after adjusting confounders, LR 1 RFA achieved comparable DFS with LR alone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document