scholarly journals A14-2 Limitations of ablation lines recordings for cavotricuspid isthmus block assessment after atrial flutter ablation

EP Europace ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. B21-B21
Author(s):  
A. Pastor ◽  
A. Nunez ◽  
A. Martin-Penato ◽  
C. Alonso ◽  
J.-C. Garcia ◽  
...  
EP Europace ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 26-27
Author(s):  
V. Ducceschi ◽  
R. Sangiuolo ◽  
R. Citro ◽  
N. Briglia ◽  
M. Santoro ◽  
...  

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco G. Cosío ◽  
Paula Awamleh ◽  
Agustín Pastor ◽  
Ambrosio Núñez

2013 ◽  
pp. 463-467
Author(s):  
Liviu Chiriac ◽  
Gabriel Cristian ◽  
Romi Bolohan ◽  
Ion C. T¸intoiu

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordi Pérez-Rodon ◽  
Julian Rodriguez-García ◽  
Axel Sarrias-Merce ◽  
Nuria Rivas-Gandara ◽  
Ivo Roca-Luque ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 1251-1257 ◽  
Author(s):  
KURT S. HOFFMAYER ◽  
YANFEI YANG ◽  
STEPHEN JOSEPH ◽  
JAMES M. MCCABE ◽  
PRASHANT BHAVE ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manabu Kashiwagi ◽  
Akio Kuroi ◽  
Yosuke Katayama ◽  
Kosei Terada ◽  
Suwako Fujita ◽  
...  

AbstractCavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) linear ablation has been established as the treatment for typical atrial flutter. Recently, ablation index (AI) has emerged as a novel marker for estimating ablation lesions. We investigated the relationship between CTI depth and ablation parameters on the procedural results of typical atrial flutter ablation. A total of 107 patients who underwent CTI ablation were retrospectively enrolled in this study. All patients underwent computed tomography before catheter ablation. From the receiver-operating curve, the best cut-off value of CTI depth was < 4.1 mm to predict first-pass success. Although the average AI was not different between deep CTI (DC; CTI depth ≥ 4.1) and shallow CTI (SC; CTI depth < 4.1), DC required a longer ablation time and showed a lower first-pass success rate (p < 0.01). In addition, the catheter inversion technique was more frequently required in the DC (p < 0.01). The lowest AI sites of the first-pass CTI line were determined in both the ventricular (2/3 segment of CTI) and inferior vena cava (IVC, 1/3 segment of CTI) sides. The best cut-off values of the weakest AIs at the ventricular and IVC sides for predicting first-pass success were > 420 and > 386, respectively. Among patients with these cut-off values, the first-pass success rate was 89% in the SC and 50% in the DC (p < 0.01). Although ablation parameters were not significantly different, the first-pass success rate was lower in the DC than in the SC. Further investigation might be required for better outcomes in deep CTIs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document