scholarly journals Perceptual bias, more than age, impacts on eye movements during face processing

2016 ◽  
Vol 164 ◽  
pp. 127-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise R. Williams ◽  
Madeleine A. Grealy ◽  
Steve W. Kelly ◽  
Iona Henderson ◽  
Stephen H. Butler
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima Maria Felisberti

Visual field asymmetries (VFA) in the encoding of groups rather than individual faces has been rarely investigated. Here, eye movements (dwell time (DT) and fixations (Fix)) were recorded during the encoding of three groups of four faces tagged with cheating, cooperative, or neutral behaviours. Faces in each of the three groups were placed in the upper left (UL), upper right (UR), lower left (LL), or lower right (LR) quadrants. Face recognition was equally high in the three groups. In contrast, the proportion of DT and Fix were higher for faces in the left than the right hemifield and in the upper rather than the lower hemifield. The overall time spent looking at the UL was higher than in the other quadrants. The findings are relevant to the understanding of VFA in face processing, especially groups of faces, and might be linked to environmental cues and/or reading habits.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e31106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Arizpe ◽  
Dwight J. Kravitz ◽  
Galit Yovel ◽  
Chris I. Baker

1999 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 963-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry R Manor ◽  
Evian Gordon ◽  
Leanne M Williams ◽  
Chris J Rennie ◽  
Homayoun Bahramali ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sébastien Miellet ◽  
Lingnan He ◽  
Xinyue Zhou ◽  
Junpeng Lao ◽  
Roberto Caldara

Culture impacts on how people sample visual information for face processing. Westerners deploy fixations towards the eyes and the mouth to achieve face recognition. In contrast, Easterners reach equal performance by deploying more central fixations, suggesting an effective extrafoveal information use. However, this hypothesis has not been yet directly investigated, i.e. by providing only extrafoveal information to both groups of observers. We used a parametric gaze-contingent technique dynamically masking central vision - the Blindspot – with Western and Eastern observers during face recognition. Westerners shifted progressively towards the typical Eastern central fixation pattern with larger Blindspots, whereas Easterners were insensitive to the Blindspots. These observations clearly show that Easterners preferentially sample information extrafoveally for faces. Conversely, the Western data also show that culturally-dependent visuo-motor strategies can flexibly adjust to constrained visual situations.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 565-565
Author(s):  
N. Xiao ◽  
P. Quinn ◽  
Q. Wang ◽  
G. Fu ◽  
K. Lee

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document