scholarly journals Cross-task congruency sequence effect without the contribution of multiple expectancy

2021 ◽  
Vol 214 ◽  
pp. 103268
Author(s):  
Chae Eun Lim ◽  
Yang Seok Cho
Keyword(s):  
Sequence Effect ◽  
Congruency Sequence Effect

Different levels of learning interact to shape the congruency sequence effect.

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 566-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel H. Weissman ◽  
Zoë W. Hawks ◽  
Tobias Egner
Keyword(s):  
Sequence Effect ◽  
Congruency Sequence Effect ◽  
Different Levels

scholarly journals Task sets serve as boundaries for the congruency sequence effect.

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 798-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren D. Grant ◽  
Savannah L. Cookson ◽  
Daniel H. Weissman
Keyword(s):  
Sequence Effect ◽  
Congruency Sequence Effect ◽  
Task Sets

scholarly journals Is there evidence for cross-domain congruency sequence effect? A replication of Kan et al . (2013)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 191353
Author(s):  
Balazs Aczel ◽  
Marton Kovacs ◽  
Miklos Bognar ◽  
Bence Palfi ◽  
Andree Hartanto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Control ◽  
Original Study ◽  
Partial Support ◽  
Sequence Effect ◽  
Theoretical Frameworks ◽  
Cross Domain ◽  
Domain Generality ◽  
Theoretical Hypothesis ◽  
Congruency Sequence Effect ◽  
Single Exception

Exploring the mechanisms of cognitive control is central to understanding how we control our behaviour. These mechanisms can be studied in conflict paradigms, which require the inhibition of irrelevant responses to perform the task. It has been suggested that in these tasks, the detection of conflict enhances cognitive control resulting in improved conflict resolution of subsequent trials. If this is the case, then this so-called congruency sequence effect can be expected to occur in cross-domain tasks. Previous research on the domain-generality of the effect presented inconsistent results. In this study, we provide a multi-site replication of three previous experiments of Kan et al . (Kan IP, Teubner-Rhodes S, Drummey AB, Nutile L, Krupa L, Novick JM 2013 Cognition 129 , 637–651) which test congruency sequence effect between very different domains: from a syntactic to a non-syntactic domain (Experiment 1), and from a perceptual to a verbal domain (Experiments 2 and 3). Despite all our efforts, we found only partial support for the claims of the original study. With a single exception, we could not replicate the original findings; the data remained inconclusive or went against the theoretical hypothesis. We discuss the compatibility of the results with alternative theoretical frameworks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document