scholarly journals Left ventricular global longitudinal strain across the spectrum of heart failure stages and its prevalence, correlates and prognostic relevance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-197
Author(s):  
C. Roy ◽  
A. Slimani ◽  
C. De Meester ◽  
M. Amzulescu ◽  
A. Pasquet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Prognostic Relevance

P5261Feature tracking by CMR: left ventricular dysfunction predicts outcome in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Kammerlander ◽  
J Kraiger ◽  
C Nitsche ◽  
C Dona ◽  
F Duca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Feature Tracking ◽  
Tissue Characterization ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Walking Distance ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Prognostic Relevance

Abstract Objectives To investigate the association between global longitudinal strain (GLS) using feature tracking (FT) cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and prognosis in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Background Echocardiography-based studies have demonstrated that in HFpEF left ventricular (LV) strain analyses can detect impaired systolic function despite preserved ejection fraction and might also predict outcome. CMR also allows strain analysis using FT and is furthermore the gold standard for assessment of ventricular volumes and ejection fractions. In addition, T1-mapping allows non-invasive tissue characterization. However, the prognostic relevance of FT-CMR is unknown. In addition right ventricular (RV) FT-CMR is poorly investigated. Methods Consecutive patients with confirmed diagnosis of HFpEF underwent CMR on a 1.5T scanner. We used dedicated software (cvi42, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc.) for global longitudinal left ventricular strain (LV-GLS) in a 3D and global longitudinal RV strain (RV-GLS) in a 2D model using feature tracking (FT). In addition, we performed uni- and multivariable Cox regression using a combined endpoint of heart failure hospitalizations, and cardiovascular death to determine the prognostic relevance of FT-CMR. Results We included a total of 131 HFpEF patients (70.4±8.6 years old, 70.2% female). Median LV-GLS by FT-CMR was −8% [IQR: −10% to 5%] and median RV-GLS was −11.9% [IQR: −16.57% to −12.23%]. LV and RV GLS values were significantly correlated with LV and RV ejection fractions (r=−0.463, p<0.001 for LV, and r=−0.306, p=0.001 and RV, respectively). 77 (58.8%) events were recorded during a follow-up of 42.0±31.4 months. Patients with an LV-GLS worse than the median (−8%) showed a significantly reduced event-free survival rate (log-rank, p=0.009).In a multivariable Cox-regression model correcting for the strongest clinical variables, including age (HR 1.018 [0.985–1.052], p=0.290), GFR (HR 0.987 [0.975–1.000], p=0.055), diabetes (HR 1.696 [1.028–2.799], p=0.039), and 6-min-walking distance (HR 0.997 [0.995–0.999)], p=0.014), LV-GLS remained significantly associated with outcome (HR 1.093 [1.039–1.150], p=0.001) while RV-GLS had no effect on outcome (p>0.05). Conclusions In patients with HFpEF, LV-GLS but not RV-GLS by FT-CMR is significantly associated with cardiovascular events.

scholarly journals Application of the current HFA-ESC consensus guidelines on diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction to a population referred for echocardiography

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Liang ◽  
R Hearse-Morgan ◽  
S Fairbairn ◽  
Y Ismail ◽  
AK Nightingale
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Diastolic Function ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Diagnostic Algorithm ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Lv Function ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Consensus Guidelines

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND The recent Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) consensus guidelines on diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have developed a simple diagnostic algorithm for clinical use. PURPOSE To assess whether echocardiogram (echo) parameters needed to assess diastolic function are routinely collected in patients referred for assessment of heart failure symptoms. METHODS Retrospective analysis of echo referrals in January 2020 were assessed for parameters of diastolic function as per step 2 of the HF-PEFF diagnostic algorithm.  Echo images and clinical reports were reviewed. Electronic records were utilised to obtain clinical history, blood results (NT-proBNP) and demographic data. RESULTS 1330 patients underwent an echo in our department during January 2020. 83 patients were referred with symptoms of heart failure without prior history of cardiac disease; 20 patients found to have impaired left ventricular (LV) function were excluded from analysis. Of the 63 patients with possible HFpEF, HF-PEFF score was low in 18, intermediate in 33 and high in 12. Median age was 68 years (range 32 to 97 years); 25% had a BMI &gt;30. There was a high prevalence of hypertension (52%), diabetes (19%) and atrial fibrillation (40%) (cf. Table 1). Body surface area (BSA) was documented in 65% of echo reports. Most echo parameters were recorded with the exception of global longitudinal strain (GLS) and indexed LV mass (cf. image 1). NT-proBNP was recorded in only 20 patients (31.7%). 12 patients with an intermediate HF-PEFF score could have been re-categorised to a high score depending on GLS and NT-proBNP (which were not recorded). CONCLUSION More than three quarters of echoes acquired in our department obtained the relevant parameters to assess diastolic function. The addition of BSA, and inclusion of NT-proBNP, and GLS would have been additive to a third of ‘intermediate’ patients to determine definite HFpEF. Our study demonstrates that the current HFA-ESC diagnostic algorithm and HF-PEFF scoring system are easy to use, highly relevant and applicable to current clinical practice. Age &gt;70 years 29 (46.0%) Obesity (BMI &gt;30) 16 (25.4%) Diabetes 12 (19%) Hypertension 33 (52.4%) Atrial Fibrillation 25 (39.7%) ECG abnormalities 18 (28.5%) Table 1. Prevalence of Clinical Risk Factors Abstract Figure. Image 1. HFPEFF score & echo parameters

scholarly journals P1386 A change in left ventricular global longitudinal strain is a prognostic indicator in congestive heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Sakaguchi ◽  
A Yamada ◽  
M Hoshino ◽  
K Takada ◽  
N Hoshino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Congestive Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Stable Condition ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Cardiac Events

Abstract Purposes We examined how changes in left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) were associated with prognosis in patients with preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF) after congestive heart failure (HF) admission. Methods We studied 123 consecutive patients (age 70 ± 15 years, 55% male) who had been hospitalized due to congestive HF with preserved LVEF (&gt; 50%). The exclusion criteria were atrial fibrillation and inadequate echo image quality for strain analyses. The patients underwent speckle-tracking echocardiography and measurement of plasma NT-ProBNP levels on the same day at the time of hospital admission as well as in the stable condition after discharge. Differences in GLS, LVEF and NT-ProBNP (delta GLS, LVEF and NT-ProBNP ; 2nd – 1st measurements) were calculated. The study end points were all-cause mortality and cardiac events. Results Mean periods of echo performance after hospitalization were 2 ±１days (1st echo) and 240 ± 289 days (2nd echo), respectively. During the follow-up (974 ± 626 days), 12 patients died and 25 patients were hospitalized because of HF worsening. In multivariate analysis, delta GLS and follow-up GLS were prognostic factors, whereas baseline and follow-up LVEF, NT-ProBNP, changes in LVEF and NT-ProBNP could not predict cardiac events. Delta GLS (p = 0.002) turned out to be the best independent prognosticator. Receiver operating characteristics analysis revealed that -0.6% of delta GLS was the optimal cut-off value to predict cardiac events and mortality (sensitivity 76%, specificity 67%, AUC 0.75). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with delta GLS more than -0.6% experienced significantly less cardiac events during the follow-up period (p &lt; 0.0001, log-rank). Conclusion A change in LV GLS after congestive HF admission was a predictor of the prognosis in patients with preserved LVEF. It would be useful to check the changes in GLS in those with preserved LVEF after discharge.

scholarly journals P803 Myocardial work in acutely decompensated heart failure patients differs between HFrEF and HFpEF

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Sahiti ◽  
C Morbach ◽  
C Henneges ◽  
M Hanke ◽  
R Ludwig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Lv Function ◽  
Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure

Abstract OnBehalf AHF Registry Background & Aim A novel echocardiographic method to non-invasively determine left ventricular (LV) myocardial work (MyW) based on speckle-tracking derived longitudinal strain and blood pressure has recently been validated against invasive reference measurements. MyW is considered less load-dependent than LV ejection fraction (EF) and LV longitudinal strain. We investigated MyW indices in patients with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF &lt;40%; HFrEF) and patients with preserved ejection fraction (LVEF ≥50%, HFpEF) admitted for acutely decompensated heart failure (AHF). Methods The AHF registry is a monocentric prospective follow-up study that comprehensively phenotypes consecutive patients hospitalized for AHF. Echocardiography was performed on the day of admission. MyW assessment was performed off-line using EchoPAC (GE, version 202). Here we present MyW indices and performed two-sided t-tests to analyze differences in numerical baseline covariates. Results We analyzed the echocardiograms of 94 AHF patients (72 ± 10 years; 36% female). 46 patients (49%) had an LVEF &lt;40%, while 48 patients (51%) presented with LVEF ≥50%. HFrEF patients were younger, less often female, and hat lower blood pressure (table). Consistent with lower LVEF, HFrEF patients had less negative global longitudinal strain and lower global constructive work, when compared to HFpEF patients. Since HFrEF patients also had higher global wasted work, this yielded a lower myocardial work efficiency compared to HFpEF patients (table). Conclusions This analysis in patients with AHF exhibited marked differences in MyW indices according to subgroups with HFrEF and HFpEF, thus adding information to the classical measures of LV function. Future research has to determine whether constructive and/or wasted MyW are valuable diagnostic or therapeutic targets in patients with AHF. Abstract P803 Figure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document