Predictions of vertical sediment flux in oscillatory flows using a two-phase, sheet-flow model

2012 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 2-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Yu ◽  
Tian-Jian Hsu ◽  
James T. Jenkins ◽  
Philip L.-F. Liu
2015 ◽  
Vol 767 ◽  
pp. 1-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thibaud Revil-Baudard ◽  
Julien Chauchat ◽  
David Hurther ◽  
Pierre-Alain Barraud

AbstractA new dataset of uniform and steady sheet-flow experiments is presented in this paper. An acoustic concentration and velocity profiler (ACVP) is used to measure time-resolved profiles of collocated 2C velocity ($u,w$) and sediment concentration and to measure the time evolution of the bed interface position. Ensemble averaging over 11 similar experiment realisations is done to evaluate the mean profiles of streamwise velocity, concentration, sediment flux and Reynolds shear stress. The repeatability, stationarity and uniformity of the flow are carefully checked for a Shields number ${\it\theta}\approx 0.5$ and a suspension number of $S=1.1$. The mean profile analysis allows to separate the flow into two distinct layers: a suspension layer dominated by turbulence and a bed layer dominated by granular interactions. The bed layer can be further subdivided into a frictional layer capped by a collisional layer. In the suspension layer, the mixing length profile is linear with a strongly reduced von Karman parameter equal to 0.225. The Schmidt number is found to be constant in this region with a mean value of ${\it\sigma}_{s}=0.44$. The present results are then interpreted in terms of existing modelling approaches and the underlying assumptions are discussed. In particular, the well-known Rouse profile is shown to predict the concentration profile adequately in the suspension layer provided that all the required parameters can be evaluated separately. However, the strong intermittency of the flow observed in the bed layer under the impact of turbulent large-scale coherent flow structures suggests the limitations of averaged steady two-phase flow models.


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Elgar ◽  
Tian-Jian Hsu ◽  
Daniel M. Hanes
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 05015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Mathieu ◽  
Tim Nagel ◽  
Cyrille Bonamy ◽  
Julien Chauchat ◽  
Zhen Cheng ◽  
...  

In this paper, the application of a two-phase flow model to scour processes is presented. The model is first calibrated against experimental data of unidirectional sheet-flow (one-dimensional configuration). The model is then applied to multi-dimensional configurations for the scour under a submarine pipeline and around a vertical pile. The results show that quantitative results can be obtained at the upstream sides of structures, the lee-wake erosion driven by the vortex shedding deserves further research.


2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tai-WeN. Hsu ◽  
Hsien-Kuo Chang ◽  
Chih-MiN. Hsieh

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Xin Chen ◽  
Zichao Zhang ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Xiaoyan Shi

The near-bed sediment concentration and vertical sediment flux are important in sediment transport mechanics, but they are known much less than the horizontal sediment flux, especially for fine sediment in unsteady flows. A developed two-phase model is applied to study the near-bed sediment concentration, vertical sediment flux, and the relevant total sediment amount for the velocity-skewed oscillatory sheet flow transport. With the sediment concentration hindered fall velocity, the classical reference concentration formulas conducted by Engelund and Fredsoe (1976) and Zyserman and Fredsoe (1994) are utilized for the comparison with the two-phase model and illustration of the phase-lag and sediment size effects in near-bed sediment concentration and vertical sediment flux. The concentration and vertical flux predicted by the two-phase model agree well with experimental data and are better than empirical formulas. Furthermore, the sediment size effect for pick-up flux function over starved bed is shown to be quite different from that containing sufficient sediment in oscillatory flows.


2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 795-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mika P. Jarvinen ◽  
A. E. P. Kankkunen ◽  
R. Virtanen ◽  
P. H. Miikkulainen ◽  
V. P. Heikkila

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document