scholarly journals 11 Results from the first-in-human clinical trial of a new robot-assisted surgical system for total laparoscopic hysterectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 224 (6) ◽  
pp. S749-S750
Author(s):  
D. Kelkar ◽  
M. Borse ◽  
G. Godbole ◽  
U. Kurlekar ◽  
E. Dinneen ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deanna Teoh ◽  
William J. Lowery ◽  
Xiaoyin Jiang ◽  
Jessie Ehrisman ◽  
Paige Halvorson ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Graves Rønk Dinesen ◽  
Birgit Hessellund ◽  
Lone Kjeld Petersen

Author(s):  
Dhananjay Kelkar ◽  
Mahindra A. Borse ◽  
Girish P. Godbole ◽  
Utkrant Kurlekar ◽  
Mark Slack

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to provide an interim safety analysis of the first 30 surgical procedures performed using the Versius Surgical System. Background Robot-assisted laparoscopy has been developed to overcome some of the important limitations of conventional laparoscopy. The new system is currently undergoing a first-in-human prospective clinical trial to confirm the safety and effectiveness of the device when performing minimal access surgery (MAS). Methods Procedures were performed using Versius by a lead surgeon supported by an operating room (OR) team. Male or female patients aged between 18 and 65 years old and requiring elective minor or intermediate gynaecological or general surgical procedures were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the rate of unplanned conversion of procedures to other MAS or open surgery. Results The procedures included nine cholecystectomies, six robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomies, four appendectomies, five diagnostic laparoscopy cases, two oophorectomies, two fallopian tube recanalisation procedures, an ovarian cystectomy and a salpingo-oophorectomy procedure. All procedures were completed successfully without the need for conversion to MAS or open surgery. No patient returned to the OR within 24 h of surgery and readmittance rate at 30 and 90 days post-surgery was 1/30 (3.3%) and 2/30 (6.7%), respectively. Conclusions This first-in-human interim safety analysis demonstrates that the Versius Surgical System is safe and can be used to successfully perform minor or intermediate gynaecological and general surgery procedures. The cases presented here provide evidence that the Versius clinical trial can continue to extend recruitment and begin to include major procedures, in alignment with the IDEAL-D Framework Stage 2b: Exploration.


2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
W. J. van Weelden ◽  
B. B. M. Gordon ◽  
E. A. Roovers ◽  
A. A. Kraayenbrink ◽  
C. I. M. Aalders ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Khaled Sakhel ◽  
Armen Kirakosyan ◽  
Suneet Chauhan ◽  
James Lukban ◽  
James Hines

Objective. To compare the operative outcomes in patients who underwent robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (RLH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Study Design. Retrospective chart review. All women who underwent RLH in hospital A and TLH in hospital B by a single surgeon were included. Results. 136 patients were included (73 in the RLH group and 63 in the TLH group). There were no conversions to laparotomy in the RLH group versus 7 (11.1%) in the TLH group (). The mean induction time was significantly greater (by 6 minutes) for RLH, independent of docking time, as compared to TLH (). Total procedure time was significantly less in the RLH group (82 minutes) as compared to TLH (108 minutes) (). Mean blood loss was less for RLH (46 mL) as compared to TLH (114 mL) (). A greater number of patients who underwent RLH were discharged on postoperative day 0 as compared to those receiving TLH (). Conclusion. RLH is a safe alternative to TLH and may offer some operative advantages, including fewer conversions to laparotomy, reduced procedure time, less blood loss, and earlier discharge.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document