INTRODUCTION:
The study compares safety and efficacy of misoprostol and dinoprostone as cervical ripening agents.
METHODS:
Patients with term, vertex, singleton pregnancy and Bishop score of 4 or less were randomly assigned to receive misoprostol pessary (n=35, 50 microg intravaginally) or dinoprostone gel (n=31, 0.5 mg intracervically) at 6 hourly intervals. If there were no progress in cervical dilatation or effective uterine contraction even after maximum dose, patients were taken for cesarean section. Patients who achieved Bishop's score more than 7 but the delivery was not progressing, were augmented with oxytocin drip.
RESULTS:
No uterine hyperstimulation was observed in both groups. However, abnormal fetal heart rate was observed in 3(8.6%) cases inmisoprostol group and 2 (6.5%) in dinoprostone group. There was no statistically significant difference in meconium passage in two groups. Apgar score less than 7 at 1 minute was seen in 6 (19.4%) and 11 (31.4%) neonates in dinoprostone and misoprostol group respectively. However Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes was found in only one neonate of dinoprostone treated patient. Both drugs were found to be equally effective in improving Bishops score with no significant difference in mean induction to delivery time. Cesarean section was done among 32.3% and 28.6% respectively in dinoprostone and misoprostol groups. There was significant reduction in the need for oxytocin augmentation in misoprostol (37.1%) group than in dinoprostone (67.7%) group.
CONCLUSIONS:
Vaginal misoprostol is an effective, safer and cheaper alternative to dinoprostone as a cervical ripening agent in underdeveloped countries.
Keywords: Apgar score, Bishops score, cervical ripening, Dinoprostone, induction, Misoprostol
Safety and Efficacy of Intra Uterine Device Placement During a Planned Cesarean Section
