Changes to child psychiatric disorders in DSM-5: The good, the bad and everything in between

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Valsamma Eapen
1991 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 939-950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Blanz ◽  
Martin H. Schmidt ◽  
Günter Esser

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 692-696
Author(s):  
Emily Harris Canning ◽  
Suzanne B. Hanser ◽  
Kathryn A. Shade ◽  
W. Thomas Boyce

Mental disorders affect 18% to 20% of children and adolescents. The rate in children with chronic illness is probably higher. This study of chronically ill children addresses the discrepancy between parent and child reports of child psychiatric disorders and the extent to which pediatricians agree with reports by children and parents regarding such problems. Eighty-three subjects, aged 9 to 18 (mean = 12.6), were recruited; they had the following diagnoses: cystic fibrosis, diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, and cancer. Subjects and one parent were interviewed separately, using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-2.1). The subject's physician completed a questionnaire asking about the presence of a range of mental disorders. Forty-one (49%) subjects reached threshold criteria for a psychiatric diagnosis, using both parent and child as informants. Psychiatric disorders were identified in only 22 subjects (54%) by the child and in 28 (68%) by parent alone. Thus, reliance on one informant resulted in failure to identify one third to one half of psychiatric disorders. Physicians' ratings agreed significantly with children's reports but not with parental reports, suggesting that physicians are sensitive to children's concerns but may underestimate the value and importance of parents' reports. Clinical and research evaluations of chronically ill children, as well as clinician identification of mental health problems, will be influenced by the choice of informant.


2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (S2) ◽  
pp. 319s-319s
Author(s):  
V. Eapen ◽  
M.E. Jakka ◽  
M.T. Abou-Saleh

Author(s):  
Kenneth S. Kendler

Prior validation approaches for psychiatric disorders, as used in DSM-IV and DSM-5, have been synchronic—snapshots of results typically taken out of temporal context. This chapter explores the advantages of a diachronic approach to validation. The discovery of juvenile-onset and adult-onset diabetes is explored as an example of a successful division of a broad biomedical syndrome into subtypes. This division has yielded fruitful insights into etiology and treatment. A psychiatric example, reviewed in detail, is the division of anxiety neurosis into panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. A range of etiologic and treatment studies have supported the distinction between these two forms of anxiety. These findings are interpreted in the context of Lakatos’s conceptual framework of a progressive versus degenerative scientific paradigm. The conclusion is that considering a diachronic or historical view of validity of psychiatric disorders adds a valuable perspective to the discipline and its nosology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document