Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Having Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (the Cholesterol Paradox)

2010 ◽  
Vol 106 (8) ◽  
pp. 1061-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Hoon Cho ◽  
Myung Ho Jeong ◽  
Youngkeun Ahn ◽  
Young Jo Kim ◽  
Shung Chull Chae ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Hoon Cho ◽  
Kyoung Jin Lee ◽  
Kyung Hwan Kim ◽  
Woo-Jin Kim ◽  
Min Chul Kim ◽  
...  

Background: There haven’t been well-designed studies conducted to know an optimal goal for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: Of 2,409 consecutive patients (62.7 ± 12.4 years, 74.1% men) with AMI who had baseline LDL-C levels ≥70mg/dL and received discharge statin prescriptions after successful percutaneous coronary intervention, 1,305 patients (61.0 ± 11.8 years, 77.0% men) who had LDL-C levels tested at 1 year (mean baseline LDL-C, 126.5 ± 33.5 mg/dL; mean LDL-C reduction at 1 year, 53.1 ± 29.3 mg/dL) were analyzed in this study. Patients were categorized into 2 groups according to the values of LDL-C at 1 year in two different ways using percent change from baseline (≥50% reduction, n=428 versus <50% reduction, n=877) and fixed levels (<70 mg/L, n=625 versus ≥70 mg/dL, n=680). The primary endpoint was the composite of major cardiac events (MCEs) including cardiac deaths, non-fatal myocardial infarctions and coronary revascularizations (angioplasty or bypass grafting) after hospital discharge. A median follow-up duration was 2.0 years (interquartile range, 1.9 to 2.1 years). Results: At 2 years, MCEs occurred in 139 patients (10.7%). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the MCEs rates at 2 years revealed that patients with ≥50% LDL-C reduction from baseline had fewer MCEs compared with <50% LDL-C reduction (8.2% versus 11.9%; Log rank P =0.026), while those with LDL-C levels <70 mg/dL at 1 year did not (<70 mg/L, 10.7% versus ≥70 mg/dL, 10.6%; Log rank P =0.998). In a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model, patients with ≥50% LDL-C reduction from baseline had a 39% reduction in the risk of MCEs compared with <50% LDL-C reduction (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.90; P =0.012). But, compared with LDL-C levels ≥70 mg/dL at 1 year, patients with LDL-C levels <70 mg/dL didn’t have a significant reduction in the risk of MCEs (adjusted HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.37; P =0.975). Conclusions: Obtaining a ≥50% reduction in LDL-C was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of MCEs after AMI, whereas achieving a <70 mg/dL was not. Our study suggests that obtaining a ≥50% reduction from baseline could be an optimal goal for LDL-C after AMI, not achieving a <70 mg/dL.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maneesh Sud ◽  
Lu Han ◽  
Maria Koh ◽  
Husam Abdel-Qadir ◽  
Peter Austin ◽  
...  

Introduction: Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Few studies have examined LDL-C control and outcomes exclusively after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Furthermore, guidelines provide no formal recommendation on when to check LDL-C after PCI. It is therefore conceivable that LDL-C is not routinely measured after PCI, many patients may have elevated LDL-C levels (≥ 70mg/dL), and that elevated LDL-C levels after PCI are associated with adverse long-term outcomes. Objective: To evaluate LDL-C levels after PCI procedures, and to assess the association between LDL-C and cardiovascular events in a population-based cohort. Methods: All patients who received their first PCI between Oct 2011 and Sep 2014 in Ontario, Canada, and had a cholesterol measurement within 6 months after PCI were included. Multivariable Fine and Gray sub-distribution hazards models were used to assess the association between LDL-C measured after PCI and the incidence of MACE (myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke and cardiovascular death) through December 31, 2016. Results: There were 47,884 patients who had their first PCI during the study period, and 52% had an LDL-C measurement within 6 months post-procedure (median age 63 years, 27% female). Among them, 57% had LDL-C < 70mg/dL, 28% had LDL-C 70 to < 100mg/dL, and 15% had LDL-C ≥ 100mg/dL. After a median of 3.2 years of follow-up, 19% of patients had a qualifying MACE. After adjustment, the incidence of MACE was significantly higher in patients with higher LDL-C levels (Figure). Conclusions: Only one in two patients had LDL-C measured within 6 months after undergoing PCI and only about half had LDL-C < 70mg/dL. Higher levels of LDL-C after PCI were associated with a significantly higher incidence of MACE. Recommendations for routine LDL-C assessment and optimization may improve patient outcomes after PCI procedures.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengping Hu ◽  
Hongya Han ◽  
Yan Sun ◽  
Yujing Cheng ◽  
Yan Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Residual risk remained significant despite effective low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering treatment. Small dense low density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDL-C) as part of LDL-C has been found to be predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD) and cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with stable CHD independently of LDL-C. However, to date, few studies have explored the role of sdLDL-C in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate the association of sdLDL-C with CV events in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. Methods: Patients hospitalized with ACS undergoing PCI were enrolled and followed up for 18 months. The risk of sdLDL-C for CV events was compared according to sdLDL-C quartiles. The primary outcome was the composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke and unplanned repeat revascularization. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed to estimate the risk of CV events. Subgroup analysis according to diabetes status and dichotomized low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) level based on median value were performed separately for cardiovascular risk.Results: A total of 6092 patients were included in the analysis (age: 60.2±10.13 years, male: 75.3%, BMI: 25.9±3.33 kg/m2, dyslipidemia: 74.1% and diabetes: 44.5 %). During 18 months of follow-up, 320 (5.2%) incident CV events occurred. Compared to the lowest sdLDL-C quartile group, patients in the highest quartile had a greater risk of CV events after multivariable adjustment (HR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.37-2.70). In the subgroup analyses, this greater risk remained significant in patients, regardless of high or low LDL-C or TG (dichotomized by the median value) and diabetes status.Conclusions: Patients with elevated sdLDL-C have a higher risk of CV events in Chinese patients with ACS undergoing PCI, providing additional value for better risk assessment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document