Codeine-acetaminophen versus nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of post–abdominal surgery pain: a systematic review of randomized trials

2009 ◽  
Vol 198 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marieke Nauta ◽  
Marieke L.A. Landsmeer ◽  
Gideon Koren
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

scholarly journals Hyaluronic Acid Injections or Oral Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs for Knee Osteoarthritis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596711989790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry E. Miller ◽  
Michael Fredericson ◽  
Roy D. Altman
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hyaluronic Acid ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Knee Pain ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Knee Function ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

Background: Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) injections and oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are common treatments for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, the comparative effects of these treatments are unclear. Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of intra-articular HA injections compared with oral NSAIDs for the treatment of knee OA. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized trials of knee OA treatment with HA injections compared with oral NSAIDs. The main outcomes were knee pain, knee function, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, study withdrawals, and study withdrawals because of AEs. Pooled effect sizes were reported at the final follow-up with standardized mean difference (SMD) for efficacy outcomes and risk ratio (RR) for safety outcomes. Results: In 6 randomized trials of 831 patients (414 HA, 417 NSAIDs), with follow-up ranging from 5 to 26 weeks, HA injections were associated with small, statistically significant improvements in knee pain (SMD, 0.15; P = .04) and knee function (SMD, 0.23; P = .01) compared with oral NSAIDs. The risk of AEs was lower with HA compared with NSAIDs (19.8% vs 29.0%; RR, 0.74; P = .01). The risk of a serious AE (RR, 1.37; P = .71), study withdrawal (RR, 1.05; P = .68), or study withdrawal because of an AE (RR, 0.65; P = .22) was comparable between groups. Gastrointestinal concerns were the most frequent AE reported, occurring more often with NSAIDs (23.4% vs 14.1%; P = .001). AEs reported more frequently with HA injections were injection site pain (11.7% vs 4.7%; P < .001), headache (8.4% vs 4.4%; P = .03), and arthralgia (8.1% vs 2.9%; P = .001). Significant heterogeneity or publication bias was not observed for any outcome. Conclusion: Comparing short-term outcomes of HA injections with oral NSAIDs for treatment of knee OA, HA injections provided statistically significant but not clinically important improvements in knee pain and function, along with a lower overall risk of AEs.

scholarly journals Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Rheumatology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 736-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patompong Ungprasert ◽  
Narat Srivali ◽  
Karn Wijarnpreecha ◽  
Prangthip Charoenpong ◽  
Eric L. Knight
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

scholarly journals Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Their Neuroprotective Role After an Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Animal Models

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822090168
Author(s):  
Mark J. Lambrechts ◽  
James L. Cook
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Animal Models ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Spinal Cord Injuries ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Improve Motor Function ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

Study Design: Systematic review. Objective: Spinal cord injuries (SCIs) resulting in motor deficits can be devastating injuries resulting in millions of health care dollars spent per incident. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a potential class of drugs that could improve motor function after an SCI. This systematic review utilizes PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the effectiveness of NSAIDs for SCI. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, and Scopus were reviewed linking the keywords of “ibuprofen,” “meloxicam,” “naproxen,” “ketorolac,” “indomethacin,” “celecoxib,” “ATB-346,” “NSAID,” and “nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug” with “spinal.” Results were reviewed for relevance and included if they met inclusion criteria. The SYRCLE checklist was used to assess sources of bias. Results: A total of 2960 studies were identified in the PubMed/MEDLINE database using the above-mentioned search criteria. A total of 461 abstracts were reviewed in Scopus, 340 in CINAHL, 179 in PsycINFO, and 7632 in Embase. A total of 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. Conclusions: NSAIDs’ effectiveness after SCI is largely determined by its ability to inhibit Rho-A. NSAIDs are a promising therapeutic option in acute SCI patients because they appear to decrease cord edema and inflammation, increase axonal sprouting, and improve motor function with minimal side effects. Studies are limited by heterogeneity, small sample size, and the use of animal models, which might not replicate the therapeutic effects in humans. There are no published human studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of these drugs after a traumatic cord injury. There is a need for well-designed prospective studies evaluating ibuprofen or indomethacin after adult spinal cord injuries.

Do Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Have a Deleterious Effect on Cartilage Repair? A Systematic Review

Cartilage ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 194760351985577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gergo Merkely ◽  
Emanuele Chisari ◽  
Claudia Lola Rosso ◽  
Christian Lattermann
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cartilage Repair ◽  
Deleterious Effect ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document