Preoperative medication use and its association with postoperative length of hospital stay in surgical oncology patients receiving comprehensive geriatric assessment

Abstract Objective To investigate the correlation of comprehensive geriatric assessment to overall survival among older gynaecologic oncology patients. Methods Between 2011 and 2017, patients >70 years had geriatric assessment before treatment. Geriatric assessment included the following tests: Old American resource and services, instrumental activities of daily living, modified Barthels index, mini-mental state examination, geriatric depression scale, mini-nutritional assessment, risk of falling and medication use. Overall survival was calculated for patients’ groups below and above median tests scores. Univariate as well as multivariate analysis was done to evaluate the association between each variable and survival. Results About 120 patients had geriatric assessment. Mean patients’ age was 76.4 ± 5. A total of 78 Patients had ovarian cancer, 16 uterine cancer, 17 cervical cancer and 9 had other gynaecologic malignancies. No correlation was found between age, BMI (body mass index) and cancer type to overall survival. Patients with scores below cut-off values of modified Barthels index, instrumental activities of daily living, mini-nutritional assessment and mini-nutritional assessment had significantly shorter overall survival (P = 0.004, 0.031, 0.046 and 0.004, respectively). This remained significant in both univariate and multivariate analysis. Conclusions Gynaecologic oncology patients with lower geriatric assessment scores have significantly lower overall survival, irrespective of cancer type. Geriatric assessment tests allow objective assessment of older patients with worst prognosis before treatment planning.

Download Full-text

Comparison of conventional fenestration discectomy with Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy for treating lumbar disc herniation:minimum 2-year long-term follow-up in 1100 patients

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽

10.1186/s12891-020-03652-0 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Quanyi Li ◽

Yongchun Zhou

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Lumbar Disc ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Bed Rest ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Postoperative Length ◽

Group A ◽

Group B ◽

Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Abstract Purpose To compare the efficacy of conventional interlaminar fenestration discectomy (IFD) with transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) for treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods The clinical data of 1100 patients who had been diagnosed with LDH between January 2012 and December 2017 were retrospectively analysed. IFD was performed on 605 patients in Group A, whereas TELD was performed on 505 patients in Group B. The Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analogue Scale for pain and modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the outcomes. The surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative off-bed activity and postoperative length of hospital stay were recorded. Results The follow-up period ranged from 24 to 60 months, with an average of 43 months. The excellent and good outcome rates were 93.5% in Group A and 92.6% in Group B. There was no significant difference in efficacy between the groups (P > 0.05). However, Group B had significantly less intraoperative blood loss and shorter bed rest duration and postoperative length of hospital stay than Group A (P < 0.05). There were two cases of postoperative recurrence in Group A and three in Group B. Conclusions Although conventional IFD and TELD had similar levels of efficacy in treating LDH, TELD had several advantages. There was less intraoperative bleeding, shorter length of hospital stay and shorter bed rest duration. It can be considered a safe and effective surgical option for treating LDH.

Download Full-text

Day of surgery: the impact on patient length of stay in a tertiary vascular unit

Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England ◽

10.1308/rcsann.2019.0075 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 102 (2) ◽

pp. 98-103 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

NC Holford ◽

C Ní Ghuidhir ◽

L Hands

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Support Services ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Postoperative Length ◽

The Difference ◽

Aneurysm Repair ◽

The Impact

Background Our hypothesis was that patients undergoing surgery earlier in the week would have better access to physiotherapy and other discharge services after surgery and, as a result, would have a shorter length of hospital stay compared with patients undergoing surgery later in the week. This study aimed to assess whether there is a significant difference in postoperative length of hospital stay between the groups with secondary assessment by operation subtype. Methods We identified all patients admitted for vascular surgery in 2015 from a prospectively collected database and divided the week into Monday to Wednesday and Thursday to Friday. Endovascular cases were included but day cases were excluded. Further analysis was performed with a breakdown in both groups by operation type. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 16.0. Results We identified 652 patients who met our criteria. Within the elective patient group, there was a significantly longer length of stay of three days for the late-week group compared with two days for the early-week group (P = 0.016). Femoral artery procedures had a median length of stay of two days for those operated on early in the week compared with four days later in the week (P < 0.005). Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair showed a trend to longer length of stay in the late-week group (P = 0.06). Conclusion Day of surgery appears to impact on patients’ length of stay following vascular procedures, with the greatest impact on medium-sized procedures. This difference could be explained by the difference in weekend support services, but further evaluation is required following introduction of weekend support services to assess this.

Download Full-text

Addition of Mesh Reinforcement for Pancreatic Stump and Braun Enteroenterostomy after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single Institution Experience

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/000313481808400320 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 84 (3) ◽

pp. 371-376

Author(s):

Jie Hua ◽

Hongbo Meng ◽

Zhigang He ◽

Le Yao ◽

Wei Sun ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Complications ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Morbidity Rate ◽

Pancreatic Stump ◽

Mesh Reinforcement ◽

Major Complications ◽

Postoperative Length ◽

Braun Enteroenterostomy ◽

Overall Mortality

The morbidity rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains high and a modified digestive reconstruction may affect the postoperative complications. We investigated a new modification of PD by adding mesh reinforcement for the pancreatic stump and Braun enteroenterostomy with the aim of reducing postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and delayed gastric emptying (DGE), respectively. From November 2010 to April 2015, 81 consecutive patients who underwent modified PD were retrospectively reviewed. The clinically relevant POPF and DGE rates were 4.9 and 6.1 per cent, respectively. The overall mortality rate was 2.4 per cent. The incidence of overall postoperative complications was 46.9 per cent, with 17.2 per cent considered as major complications (Clavien grades 3–5). The median postoperative length of hospital stay was 17 days (range 10–119 days). For patients who had major complications, median postoperative length of hospital stay increased significantly (22 vs 13 days, P = 0.001), as compared with those patients with no complications. The new modified digestive reconstruction after PD seems safe and reliable with low clinically relevant POPF and DGE rates. Further prospective controlled trials are essential to support these results.

Download Full-text

Does Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio Predict Hospital Stay in Appendectomy Patients?

International Surgery ◽

10.9738/intsurg-d-15-00249.1 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 101 (5-6) ◽

pp. 222-226 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Zulfu Bayhan ◽

Sezgin Zeren ◽

Ertugrul Kargi ◽

Faik Yaylak ◽

Mehmet Korkmaz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Ct Scan ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽

Lymphocyte Ratio ◽

Postoperative Length ◽

Pathology Reports ◽

The Impact ◽

The Relationship ◽

Histopathologic Findings

We aimed to investigate the relationship between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the postoperative length of hospital stay. In addition, the impact of radiologic and histopathologic findings on hospital stay was also evaluated. This was a retrospective study; 103 patients with appendicitis were included. Diagnosis was confirmed with computerized tomography (CT) scans, ultrasonography, and histopathologic examination. Correlations between the length of hospital stay and age; sex; NLR; c-reactive peptide (CRP) levels; appendix diameter on CT scan or ultrasonography; appendix localization; and pathology reports were evaluated. The length of hospital stay was not related to age or sex. The length of hospital stay after appendectomy was correlated with appendix diameter on CT scan and phlegmonous appendicitis, but it was not associated with NLR, CRP levels, or appendix diameter on ultrasonography. This is a pioneer study, given there is no comprehensive study to date evaluating the association between NLR levels and the length of hospital stay of patients with acute appendicitis. NLR is not associated with the length of hospital stay. Appendix diameter with CT scan and appendix pathology reports are correlated with the length of postoperative hospital stay in appendectomy patients.

Download Full-text