scholarly journals Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy for esophageal cancer; A case series

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 9-13
Author(s):  
Yasue Kimura ◽  
Hiroshi Saeki ◽  
Qingjiang Hu ◽  
Yuichi Hisamatsu ◽  
Mioko Matsuo ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (S5) ◽  
pp. 1060-1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoko Takesue ◽  
Hiroya Takeuchi ◽  
Masaharu Ogura ◽  
Kazumasa Fukuda ◽  
Rieko Nakamura ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Kawahara ◽  
T. Maekawa ◽  
K. Okabayashi ◽  
T. Hideshima ◽  
T. Shiraishi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 121-121
Author(s):  
Takashi Kamei

Abstract Background Thoracoscopic esophagectomy has been performed for two decades and becomes widely spread. We evaluate our cases who undergone the thoracoscopic esophagectomy and consider the future prospective of this operation. Methods 702 patients who received thoracoscopic esophagectomy in our institute from March 1995 to October 2017 were enrolled and studied retrospectively. Operative indication is an all of the clinically resectable cases including with a neoadjuvant treatment or definitive chemoradiotherapy before surgery. Overall survival rate of the patients with thoracoscopic approach and with thoracotomy until 2001 was analyzed. Long term outcome of the patients with thoracoscopic esophagectomy was compared to the result from comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan. Short term results of the perioperative parameters were analyzed between left lateral decubitus position and prone position. Results There was no significant differences of the survival rate between thoracoscopic group and thoracotomy group based on pathological stage. 5 year survival without neoadjuvant treatment was 88.9% (pStageI), 71.5%(pStageIIA), 68.1%(pStageIIB), 40.9%(pStageIII), respectively.5 year survival rate of cStageII and III with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 65.7% and 5 year survival rate of the salvage esophagectomy after failure of definitive chemoradiotherapy was 31.4%. Every outcomes are as good as any reported results in esophagectomy. In the comparison of the lateral position with the prone position, total blood loss was significantly lower in prone position. Inflammatory response after surgery was improved more rapidly in prone group, therefore, prone position is recommended as a minimally invasive procedure for thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Conclusion Thoracoscopic esophagectomy will develop further as a standard operation for esophageal cancer. However, from the point of view of the safety, an appropriate educational systems of this advanced procedure should build. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document