scholarly journals 188 Impact of Adult Level 1 Trauma Designation on the Timeliness of Pediatric Emergency Department Computed Tomography Scans

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. S75-S76
Author(s):  
O. Ukwuoma ◽  
S. Melgarejo ◽  
M. Dingeldein ◽  
J. Sheele ◽  
L. Dingeldein
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 708-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aravindhan Veerapandiyan ◽  
Akilandeswari Aravindhan ◽  
James Huynh Takahashi ◽  
Devorah Segal ◽  
Keith Pecor ◽  
...  

Objective: Cranial computed tomography (CT) is not recommended in the routine evaluation of children with first afebrile seizure due to its low yield. The objective was to assess the current practice in our pediatric emergency department regarding the use of head CT in children with first afebrile seizure and to identify the factors that lead to ordering a head CT. Methods: Medical records of patients between 1 month and 18 years old evaluated at our emergency department for presentation of first afebrile seizure between 2010 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Data extracted include age, gender, seizure type, single or multiple seizures at presentation, seizure duration, predisposing conditions to seizures (ie, history of developmental delay), and whether a head CT was performed. Contingency tables with chi-square analyses were used to determine which variables were associated with increased use of head CT. Results: Of 155 patients (88M/67F) included in the study, 72 (46.5%) underwent head CT and only 3 had clinically significant findings that did not require acute management. There were no differences in CT use by age, sex, seizure type, seizure number, seizure risk factors, or findings on physical examination. Head CT was performed more frequently in cases with seizures ≥5 minutes and unknown seizure duration ( P = .04). Conclusion: Despite existing evidence, the emergent head CT rate was high in our cohort. Children with seizure duration of ≥5 minutes or of unknown duration were more likely to undergo head CT in our emergency department.


2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 1212-1223
Author(s):  
Brendan R. Harris ◽  
Sri S. Chinta ◽  
Ryan Colvin ◽  
David Schnadower ◽  
Phillip I. Tarr ◽  
...  

Although common, little is known about the characteristics and management of undifferentiated abdominal pain (UAP) in the pediatric emergency department (ED). This study was a 12-month retrospective study for “abdominal pain” ED visits. Patients without an identifiable diagnosis were categorized as “UAP,” while others with identified disease processes were categorized as “structural gastrointestinal diagnosis (SGID).” We included 2383 (72%) visits with 869 (36.5%) UAP visits and 1514 (63.5%) SGID visits. SGID patients had more laboratory tests (811 [53.6%] vs 422 [48.6%], P = .0186), and often had multiple tests performed (565 [69.7%] vs 264 [62.6%], P = .0116). Computed tomography and ultrasound scans were more common in SGID (computed tomography: 108 [7.1%] vs 27 [3.1%], P = .0004; ultrasound: 377 [24.9%] vs 172 [19.9%], P = .0044), and laboratory results (white blood cell count, hemoglobin, albumin, C-reactive protein) were abnormal at significantly higher rates. Analyses revealed the duration of pain as primary covariate in variance of pain etiology. Clinical features, such as duration of pain, may be augmented by laboratory tests to facilitate recognition of UAP in the ED.


2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 470-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Jack Frush ◽  
Clayton W. Commander ◽  
Terry Scott Hartman ◽  
Aaron Kyle Cecil ◽  
Brian Douglas Handly ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document