scholarly journals 172P Triple combination therapy of lenvatinib, toripalimab, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S1306
Author(s):  
Z-C. Lai ◽  
M-K. He ◽  
M. Shi ◽  
Q-J. Li
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Triple Combination ◽  
Arterial Infusion ◽  
Triple Combination Therapy ◽  
Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Infusion Chemotherapy

Triple combination therapy comprising angiogenesis inhibitors, anti-PD-1 antibodies, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16124-e16124
Author(s):  
Ti Zhang ◽  
Jinliang Zhang ◽  
Xihao Zhang ◽  
Han Mu ◽  
Ge Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion ◽  
Angiogenesis Inhibitors ◽  
Triple Combination ◽  
Arterial Infusion ◽  
Triple Combination Therapy ◽  
Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Infusion Chemotherapy

e16124 Background: The effects of single-drug therapy for the systemic treatment of advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unsatisfactory, promoting the emergence of multi-drug and combination therapies. Here we assess the safety and efficacy of a triple combination therapy for treating advanced HCC. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients with unresectable HCC treated with triple combination therapy comprising angiogenesis inhibitors (oral apatinib 250 mg/day, lenvatinib 8 mg/day, or sorafenib 400 mg BID), anti-programmed cell death 1 antibodies (iv camrelizumab or sintilimab, 200 mg every 3 weeks), and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (FOLFOX every 4–8 weeks). Eligible patients had completed at least one cycle of therapy and had an imaging assessment. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Efficacy data were summarized according to modified RECIST (mRECIST) and RECIST v1.1. Results: Of 34 patients who received triple combination therapy, 25 (19 men and 6 women; median age: 59 years [range: 49–78]) had an imaging assessment. TRAEs were manageable; 28.0% of patients experienced grade 3–4 TRAEs. Efficacy outcomes are summarized in the Table. The objective response rate was 96.0% (mRECIST), the median time to response was 50.5 days (95% CI: 31.02–64.00) and the surgical conversion rate was 56%, indicating a robust therapeutic effect. Overall, 12 patients (48.0%) achieved a complete response (CR), 12 (48.0%) achieved a partial response, and one (4.0%) had stable disease (mRECIST). Fourteen patients (56.0%) underwent surgical resection, after which seven (28.0%) achieved a pathologic CR. After a median follow-up of 9.67 months, no cases of post-operative recurrence or metastasis emerged. Conclusions: Triple combination therapy had a robust therapeutic effect with a high surgical conversion rate in patients with advanced HCC. TRAEs were acceptable, and long-term efficacy is reasonably expected. Summary of efficacy outcomes (n = 25).[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Clinical Benefits of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1882
Author(s):  
Takahiro Yamasaki ◽  
Issei Saeki ◽  
Yurika Kotoh-Yamauchi ◽  
Ryo Sasaki ◽  
Norikazu Tanabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Vascular Invasion ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Arterial Infusion ◽  
Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Recent Success ◽  
Clinical Benefits

Recent success of systemic therapeutic agents, including combination immunotherapy, could promote a change in the treatment strategy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a treatment option for advanced HCC in Japan, it is not recommended by other guidelines. We discuss the clinical benefits of HAIC compared to sorafenib. The clinical benefits of HAIC are as follows: (1) even a patient with Child–Pugh B HCC (7 or 8 points) is a candidate for HAIC (2) Child–Pugh scores barely decline with the use of HAIC compared with sorafenib (3) HAIC is highly effective in patients with vascular invasion compared with sorafenib; and (4) survival in patients receiving HAIC may not be associated with skeletal muscle volume. In contrast, the disadvantages are problems related with the reservoir system. HAIC has clinical benefits in a subpopulation of patients without extrahepatic metastasis with Child–Pugh A HCC and vascular invasion (especially primary branch invasion or main portal vein invasion) or with Child–Pugh B HCC.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma by placing a temporary catheter via the subclavian route

2007 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 734-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huei-Lung Liang ◽  
Jer-Shyung Huang ◽  
Yi-Huei Lin ◽  
Kwok-Hung Lai ◽  
Chien-Fang Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Arterial Infusion ◽  
Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Infusion Chemotherapy

Background: A permanent reservoir implantation is considered mandatory for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Since treatment sessions of HAIC may be limited for these end-staged patients, a simple alternative technique for this treatment is desirable. Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of placing a temporary catheter for HAIC in advanced HCC patients. Material and Methods: 25 advanced HCC patients underwent HAIC with drugs delivered from a temporary catheter which was placed percutaneously by puncturing the left subclavian artery under ultrasound guidance. A course of chemotherapy consisted of five consecutive daily infusions of 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, mitomycin C, and leucovorin. The catheter was removed on the 6th day. Therapy was repeated every 4–6 weeks with maximal number of courses of up to six. The total courses of HAIC in each patient, the catheter-placed-related complications, tumor response rate, and median survival of the patients were registered. Results: A total of 77 courses of HAIC were performed with 100% technical success of catheter placement (1–6 courses in each patient, average 3.1 courses). The overall response rate was 20%, with complete response in two patients and partial response in three patients. Eleven (55%) of the 20 non-responders died within 5 months (mean HAIC, two courses). None of the patients experienced complications such as catheter occlusion, hepatic arterial thrombosis, cerebral infarction, or local infection. Conclusion: With fewer catheter-related complications, HAIC by temporary catheter placement via subclavian puncture could be a treatment option.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document