scholarly journals 1476P Is it worth adding concurrent chemo-radiotherapy or radiotherapy on the top of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma? A systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S1090
Author(s):  
A. Saha ◽  
J. Wadsley ◽  
B. Sirohi ◽  
R. Goody ◽  
D. Ulahannan ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 327-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang O Son ◽  
Sachin Gopalkrishn Pai ◽  
Suma Satti ◽  
Adriana Dornelles ◽  
John S. Bolton ◽  
...  

327 Background: The clinical benefit of neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (borderline/unresectable) has not been well established. However, the challenge of managing locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma has led to the incorporation of neoadjuvant treatment into clinical practice. FOLFIRINOX has been increasingly used as neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but may not be well tolerated especially in older patients due to adverse effect profile. In our institution, we have used FOLFOX as an alternative for older patients and patients with poor performance status based on our retrospective observation of FOLFOX in metastatic/advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients from January 1, 2011 to February 28, 2013 treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFOX/FOLFIRINOX) with the intention of future resection. In addition patients also received neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Imaging studies, operative notes and Pathology reports were reviewed. Results: 27 patients were analyzed, 10 received FOLFIRINOX and 17 received FOLFOX regimen. Mean age of patients were 57.28 ± 11.68 SD and 68.66± 11.21 SD in the two groups respectively. Patients received 4.2 ± 0.92 SD and 3.59 ±1.06 SD cycles of chemotherapy in FOLFIRINOX and FOLFOX groups respectively. Mean duration of follow up was similar in both groups. 5 patients on FOLFOX and 1 patient on FOLFIRINOX had disease progression thereby precluding surgery. The Rate of R0 resections was 64.7 % and 60% (P 0.27) in the two groups respectively. Overall survival was not statistically significant between the two groups. (Kaplan Meier survival graphs will accompany final presentation). Conclusions: In our study, FOLFIRINOX was administered in younger patients. However the R0 resection rates were similar in both the groups. FOLFOX may be acceptable neoadjuvant chemotherapy of choice in patients with borderline functional status. Randomized trials are needed to define this better.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document