A comparative study of navigation interfaces in virtual reality environments: A mixed-method approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 103482
Author(s):  
Yong Min Kim ◽  
Ilsun Rhiu
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Mixed Method ◽  
Mixed Method Approach ◽  
Method Approach

Are biodiversity perception and attitudes context dependent? A comparative study using a mixed-method approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 105703
Author(s):  
Fátima Bernardo ◽  
Isabel Loupa-Ramos ◽  
Joana Carvalheiro
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Mixed Method ◽  
Mixed Method Approach ◽  
Context Dependent ◽  
Method Approach

GENERATION Y AND ITS PERCEPTION OF COOL BRANDS – A MIXED-METHOD APPROACH

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Jakić ◽  
◽  
Maximilian Wagner ◽  
Anton Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Generation Y ◽  
Mixed Method ◽  
Mixed Method Approach ◽  
Method Approach

Underpining the Relaionships between Burnout, Depression and Somatic Stress - A Mixed Method Approach

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-16
Author(s):  
Syed Gohar Abbas ◽  
◽  
Jalil Ahmed ◽  
Zainab Fakhr
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Method ◽  
Mixed Method Approach ◽  
Somatic Stress ◽  
Method Approach

A case study evaluation of a community multidisciplinary team in South East England using a mixed-method approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. bjgp20X711569
Author(s):  
Jessica Wyatt Muscat
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mixed Method ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Free Form ◽  
Normalisation Process Theory ◽  
Multidisciplinary Teams ◽  
Mixed Method Approach ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Method Approach

BackgroundCommunity multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) represent a model of integrated care comprising health, social care, and the voluntary sector where members work collaboratively to coordinate care for those patients most at risk.AimThe evaluation will answer the question, ‘What are the enablers and what are the restrictors to the embedding of the case study MDT into the routine practice of the health and social care teams involved in the project?’MethodThe MDT was evaluated using a mixed-method approach with normalisation process theory as a methodological tool. Both quantitative and qualitative data were gathered through a questionnaire consisting of the NoMAD survey followed by free-form questions.ResultsThe concepts of the MDT were generally clear, and participants could see the potential benefits of the programme, though this was found to be lower in GPs. Certain professionals, particularly mental health and nursing professionals, found it difficult to integrate the MDT into normal working patterns because of a lack of resources. Participants also felt there was a lack of training for MDT working. A lack of awareness of evidence supporting the programme was shown particularly within management, GP, and nursing roles.ConclusionSpecific recommendations have been made in order to improve the MDT under evaluation. These include adjustments to IT systems and meeting documentation, continued education as to the purpose of the MDT, and the engagement of GPs to enable better buy-in. Recommendations were made to focus the agenda with specialist attendance when necessary, and to expand the MDT remit, particularly in mental health and geriatrics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document