scholarly journals Scenarios of land system change in the Lao PDR: Transitions in response to alternative demands on goods and services provided by the land

2016 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Ornetsmüller ◽  
Peter H. Verburg ◽  
Andreas Heinimann
2021 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 102380
Author(s):  
Marc Schmid ◽  
Andreas Heinimann ◽  
Julie G. Zaehringer

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 440-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhifeng Liu ◽  
Peter H. Verburg ◽  
Jianguo Wu ◽  
Chunyang He

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 473-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhanli Sun ◽  
Liangzhi You ◽  
Daniel Müller

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1798-1817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinli Ke ◽  
Weiwei Zheng ◽  
Ting Zhou ◽  
Xiaoping Liu

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Abdullah Shaikh ◽  
Michalis Hadjikakou ◽  
Brett A. Bryan

Abstract To achieve responsible consumption and production under UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 12, national agri-food consumption and production need to be assessed against environmental limits. We downscaled the Land-System Change planetary boundary and allocated national-scale environmental limits for cropland for agri-food consumption via fairshare allocation based on population, and for production via biophysical allocation based on available arable land. We assessed country-level utilisation of Land-System Change planetary boundary for cropland due to their cropland footprints. We quantified national consumption and production-based cropland footprints (including imports/exports) using an environmentally extended multi-regional input-output model and calculated the percentage utilisation of national environmental limits for cropland. Most countries' agri-food consumption footprints exceeded their fair-share cropland limit, but production utilisation of biophysical limits was less pronounced. For example, China and India were within their safe limit of consumption-based environmental limit for cropland with utilisation ratio of 80% and 74% respectively, but their utilisation ratio for production-based environmental limit was 132% and 165% respectively. Assessing country-level utilisation of the environmental limit for cropland can provide a basis for countries to act as individual entities, or together in groups, to develop policies that mitigate their global cropland impacts and minimise the risks associated with the exceedance of the Land-System Change planetary boundary.


Land ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Gaughan ◽  
Forrest Stevens ◽  
Narcisa Pricope ◽  
Joel Hartter ◽  
Lin Cassidy ◽  
...  

Understanding how individuals, communities, and populations vary in their vulnerability requires defining and identifying vulnerability with respect to a condition, and then developing robust methods to reliably measure vulnerability. In this study, we illustrate how a conceptual model translated via simulation can guide the real-world implementation of data collection and measurement of a model system. We present a generalizable statistical framework that specifies linkages among interacting social and biophysical components in complex landscapes to examine vulnerability. We use the simulated data to present a case study in which households are vulnerable to conditions of land function, which we define as the provision of goods and services from the surrounding environment. We use an example of a transboundary region of Southern Africa and apply a set of hypothesized, simulated data to illustrate how one might use the framework to assess vulnerability based on empirical data. We define vulnerability as the predisposition of being adversely affected by environmental variation and its impacts on land uses and their outcomes as exposure (E), mediated by sensitivity (S), and mitigated by adaptive capacity (AC). We argue that these are latent, or hidden, characteristics that can be measured through a set of observable indicators. Those indicators and the linkages between latent variables require model specification prior to data collection, critical for applying the type of modeling framework presented. We discuss the strength and directional pathways between land function and vulnerability components, and assess their implications for identifying potential leverage points within the system for the benefit of future policy and management decisions.


AMBIO ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 1183-1194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Rufin ◽  
Florian Gollnow ◽  
Daniel Müller ◽  
Patrick Hostert
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document