The Effectiveness of High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) on de Quervain's Tenosynovitis: A Randomized, Double-Blinded (Patient and Assessor), Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 102 (10) ◽  
pp. e63-e64
Author(s):  
Tanach Chongkriengkrai ◽  
Jariya Boonhong
Pain Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 2357-2365
Author(s):  
Raquel Cantero-Téllez ◽  
Jorge Hugo Villafañe ◽  
Kirstin Valdes ◽  
Santiago García-Orza ◽  
Mark D Bishop ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To examine the effects of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) on pain sensitivity and motor performance in patients with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA). Design Prospective, triple-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Setting Private practice, Malaga, Spain. Subjects Forty-three patients (mean ± SD age = 71 ± 12 years) with a diagnosis of thumb CMC OA grade 1–2 were randomized to the control group (N = 21) or experimental group (N = 22). Methods The experimental group (ExpG) received high-intensity laser therapy (HILT), and the control group (ConG) received a placebo treatment. The outcome measures were pain intensity (visual analog scale) and key pinch strength measurements (dynamometer). All outcome measures were collected at baseline, immediately following the intervention, at four weeks, and at 12 weeks following the intervention. Results Analysis of variance revealed a group × time interaction (F = 40.8, P < 0.001) for pain intensity, with those patients receiving LT experiencing a greater reduction in pain compared with those receiving placebo therapy at the end of the intervention (P < 0.001), as well as at 12 weeks after the intervention. Although mean values in the ExpG were higher than in the ConG for key pinch at assessment, these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions HILT effectively diminishes pain intensity when used as an isolated treatment for patients with thumb CMC OA, but the effect of treatment decreases after 12 weeks.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e20-e20
Author(s):  
Rahele Kenareh ◽  
Seyyed Jalil Mirmohammadi ◽  
Amidoddine Khatibi ◽  
Farimah Shamsi ◽  
Amir Houshang Mehrparvar

Introduction: Chronic neck pain is a common complaint among office workers. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of a high-intensity laser and physiotherapy in office workers who were diagnosed with chronic non-specific neck pain. Methods: This study was a single-blind randomized controlled trial, with parallel allocation. Sixty office workers with chronic neck pain, aged between 25 and 55 years, participated in the study. The participants were randomly divided into two groups: photobiomodulation (by a high-level laser) and physiotherapy. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) and Bournemouth Questionnaire (BQN) were completed on three occasions (before, immediately and 2 weeks after the intervention) to assess and compare the efficacy of the high-intensity laser and physiotherapy in neck pain. Data were analyzed by SPSS 23 software using the chi-square test, Student’s t test, multivariate tests, and Fisher’s exact test. Results: The mean age of the participants was 37.53±9.52 and 41.16±7.85 years in physiotherapy and laser therapy respectively. The VAS score and NDI scores decreased after both kinds of interventions, and the effect of photobiomodulation was significantly higher than physiotherapy (P<0.001). Both treatment modalities significantly affect different aspects of chronic neck pain assessed by NDPS and BQN questionnaires and the effect of photobiomodulation was more prominent than physiotherapy. Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that photobiomodulation and physiotherapy can reduce chronic neck pain and its different aspects and the effect of laser therapy was significantly higher than physiotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document