Optimization of a Monte Carlo variance reduction method based on sensitivity derivatives

2013 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 160-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaning Liu ◽  
M. Yousuff Hussaini ◽  
Giray Ökten
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 1139-1188
Author(s):  
Aaron R. Dinner ◽  
Erik H. Thiede ◽  
Brian Van Koten ◽  
Jonathan Weare

2021 ◽  
Vol 151 ◽  
pp. 107958
Author(s):  
Tao Shi ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Qianxue Ding ◽  
Mengqi Wang ◽  
Zheng Zheng ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 015205
Author(s):  
Liang Shan-Yong ◽  
Wang Jiang-An ◽  
Zhang Feng ◽  
Wu Rong-Hua ◽  
Zong Si-Guang ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing-Chen Nie ◽  
Jia Li ◽  
Song-Lin Liu ◽  
Xiao-Kang Zhang ◽  
Ping-Hui Zhao ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 151-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin Jimenez ◽  
Yaning Liu ◽  
M. Yousuff Hussaini

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 192
Author(s):  
IRENE MAYLINDA PANGARIBUAN ◽  
KOMANG DHARMAWAN ◽  
I WAYAN SUMARJAYA

Value at Risk (VaR) is a method to measure the maximum loss with a certain level of confidence in a certain period. Monte Carlo simulation is the most popular method of calculating VaR. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate control variates method as a variance reduction method that can be applied to estimate VaR. Moreover, it is to compare the results with the normal VaR method or analytical VaR calculation. Control variates method was used to find new returns from all stocks which are used as estimators of the control variates. The new returns were then used to define parameters needed to generate N random numbers. Furthermore, the generated numbers were used to find the VaR value. The method was then applied to estimate a portfolio of the game and esports company stocks that are EA, TTWO, AESE, TCEHY, and ATVI . The results show Monte Carlo simulation gives VaR of US$41.6428 within 1000 simulation, while the analytical VaR calculation  or  normal VaR method gives US$30.0949.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document