Comparative thermal performances of a ground source heat pump and a variable capacity air source heat pump systems for sustainable houses

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 279-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir A. Safa ◽  
Alan S. Fung ◽  
Rakesh Kumar
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Alizadeh Safa

The thermal performance of a new two-stage variable capacity air source heat pump (ASHP) and a horizontal ground loop ground source heat pump (GSHP) was investigated side-by-side at the Archetype Sustainable Twin Houses located in Toronto, Canada. The heat pumps were tested in cooling mode, as well as heating mode under extreme winter conditions. In cooling mode, the ASHP COP ranged from 4.7 to 5.7 at an outdoor temperature of 33 degrees C and 16 degrees C respectively, while the GSHP COP ranged from 4.9 (at an ELT of 8.5 degrees C and EST of 19.2 degrees C) to 5.6 (at an ELT of 12. 4 degrees C and EST of 17.8 degrees C). In heating mode, the ASHP COP ranged from 1.79 to 5.0 at an outdoor temperature of -19 degrees C and 9 degrees C respectively, while the GSHP COP ranged from 3.05 (at an ELT of 44.4 degrees C and an EST of 2.7 degrees C) to 3.44 (at an ELT of 41.5 degrees C and an EST of 5.48 degrees C) during the earlier winter test period. Data extrapolation and energy simulation was also performed to predict annual heat pump performance in Toronto as well as other Canadian regions.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Alizadeh Safa

The thermal performance of a new two-stage variable capacity air source heat pump (ASHP) and a horizontal ground loop ground source heat pump (GSHP) was investigated side-by-side at the Archetype Sustainable Twin Houses located in Toronto, Canada. The heat pumps were tested in cooling mode, as well as heating mode under extreme winter conditions. In cooling mode, the ASHP COP ranged from 4.7 to 5.7 at an outdoor temperature of 33 degrees C and 16 degrees C respectively, while the GSHP COP ranged from 4.9 (at an ELT of 8.5 degrees C and EST of 19.2 degrees C) to 5.6 (at an ELT of 12. 4 degrees C and EST of 17.8 degrees C). In heating mode, the ASHP COP ranged from 1.79 to 5.0 at an outdoor temperature of -19 degrees C and 9 degrees C respectively, while the GSHP COP ranged from 3.05 (at an ELT of 44.4 degrees C and an EST of 2.7 degrees C) to 3.44 (at an ELT of 41.5 degrees C and an EST of 5.48 degrees C) during the earlier winter test period. Data extrapolation and energy simulation was also performed to predict annual heat pump performance in Toronto as well as other Canadian regions.


Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arif Widiatmojo ◽  
Sasimook Chokchai ◽  
Isao Takashima ◽  
Yohei Uchida ◽  
Kasumi Yasukawa ◽  
...  

The cooling of spaces in tropical regions, such as Southeast Asia, consumes a lot of energy. Additionally, rapid population and economic growth are resulting in an increasing demand for space cooling. The ground-source heat pump has been proven a reliable, cost-effective, safe, and environmentally-friendly alternative for cooling and heating spaces in various countries. In tropical countries, the presumption that the ground-source heat pump may not provide better thermal performance than the normal air-source heat pump arises because the difference between ground and atmospheric temperatures is essentially low. This paper reports the potential use of a ground-source heat pump with horizontal heat exchangers in a tropical country—Thailand. Daily operational data of two ground-source heat pumps and an air-source heat pump during a two-month operation are analyzed and compared. Life cycle cost analysis and CO2 emission estimation are adopted to evaluate the economic value of ground-source heat pump investment and potential CO2 reduction through the use of ground-source heat pumps, in comparison with the case for air-source heat pumps. It was found that the ground-source heat pumps consume 17.1% and 18.4% less electricity than the air-source heat pump during this period. Local production of heat pumps and heat exchangers, as well as rapid regional economic growth, can be positive factors for future ground-source heat pump application, not only in Thailand but also southeast Asian countries.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 619-628
Author(s):  
Wanying Zhao ◽  
Meizhi Wang ◽  
Hao Li ◽  
Guoming Li ◽  
Zhengxiang Shi

HighlightsAn old nursery pig building was retrofitted to potentially improve envelope insulation capacity.A mathematical theory based on coal consumption was established to evaluate energy efficiency of insulation renovation for a nursery pig building.The heat loss of the nursery pig house with 90-mm-thick extruded polystyrene boards was 60% lower than that without the materials.Ground source heat pump and air source heat pump are economical and environmental-friendly heating systems.Abstract. Appropriate renovation of old buildings is critical for energy-efficient pig production. Currently, energy consumption, especially coal consumption, keeps on rising in the production. Therefore, it is essential to develop energy-saving renovation methods for old nursery pig buildings and use cleaner heating energies. A mathematical theory based on coal consumption was established to evaluate energy efficiency of insulation renovation. Two nursery pig houses were tested in this experiment. One was the retrofitted house with the 90-mm-thick extruded polystyrene boards embedded onto outer walls, and the other one was served as a control house without those insulation materials. The results show that the air temperature and inside surface temperature of the retrofitted house were significantly higher than those of the control house in winter. Therefore, though adding insulation layers to walls, the envelope insulation capacity was improved. Meanwhile, the heat loss of the retrofitted house was 60% lower than that of the control house (11.08 W m-2 vs. 27.93 W m-2), when the theoretical ventilation rate was 1560 m3 h-1. In addition, with the prohibition of the coal usage in forseeable future of China, the ground source heat pump and air source heat pump can be economical solutions for heating systems with clean and renewable energy. Keywords: Air source heat pump, Extruded polystyrene board, Ground source heat pump, Heating, Thermal insulation.


2013 ◽  
Vol 671-674 ◽  
pp. 2122-2125
Author(s):  
Qi Wang ◽  
Qiang Wang ◽  
Xiao Yang Hui ◽  
Zhi Jun Shi

Composition and operating modes of two different solar-assisted heat pump systems have been introduced in this paper. The advantages of compound heat pump system are analyzed compared with solo heat pump system. Solar-assisted air source heat pump system not only has the advantages, which air source heat pump system (ASHP) has, but also makes good use of renewable solar energy. It can provide cooling, heating and living hot water all the year. Solar-assisted ground source heat pump system realizes advantage complementation in various seasons between solar heat water system and ground source heat pump (GSHP) system. Solar-assisted ground source heat pump system can adjust the system operating model to solve the disadvantage of sole GSHP system, whose performance decrease for the temperature change of soil for long time operating with annual cool and heat unbalancedness. GSHP system can effectively increase the operating stability with the assistance of solar energy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 233 ◽  
pp. 01038
Author(s):  
Hao Wu ◽  
Wanfu Liu ◽  
Wuqin Qi ◽  
Shuo Ma

This paper studies the efficiency of ground source heat pump(GSHP) used in refrigeration and heating, comparing it with air source heat pump (ASHP) by means of theoretical analysis and experiment. The results were as follows, the cooling efficiency of GSHP in summer is higher than that of heating in winter because of the heat is transferred from high temperature to low temperature during cooling in summer, which can be compared to heat pipe; By calculating the power consumption of pump and fan, it is found that theoretically GSHP unit and system have higher heating efficiency than ASHP; The experiment shows that the daily average COP of the unit and the system is 4.22-4.62 and 3.26-3.55, respectively, both the unit COP and system COP of GSHP is higher than that of ASHP, which is consistent with the theoretical analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document