Idiopathic clubfoot treatment and heterogeneity of current therapeutic strategies: The Ponseti method versus the French functional method (a systematic review)

Author(s):  
E. de La Taille ◽  
J. Sales de Gauzy ◽  
M. Gaubert Noirot
2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (6) ◽  
pp. 639-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Gelfer ◽  
S. Wientroub ◽  
K. Hughes ◽  
A. Fontalis ◽  
D. M. Eastwood

AimsThe Ponseti method is the benchmark treatment for the correction of clubfoot. The primary rate of correction is very high, but outcome further down the treatment pathway is less predictable. Several methods of assessing severity at presentation have been reported. Classification later in the course of treatment is more challenging. This systematic review considers the outcome of the Ponseti method in terms of relapse and determines how clubfoot is assessed at presentation, correction, and relapse.Patients and MethodsA prospectively registered systematic review was carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies that reported idiopathic clubfoot treated by the Ponseti method between 1 January 2012 and 31 May 2017 were included. The data extracted included demographics, Ponseti methodology, assessment methods, and rates of relapse and surgery.ResultsA total of 84 studies were included (7335 patients, 10 535 clubfeet). The relapse rate varied between 1.9% and 45%. The rates of relapse and major surgery (1.4% to 53.3%) and minor surgery (0.6% to 48.8%) both increased with follow-up time. There was high variability in the assessment methods used across timepoints; only 57% of the studies defined relapse. Pirani scoring was the method most often used.ConclusionRecurrence and further surgical intervention in idiopathic clubfoot increases with the duration of follow-up. The corrected and the relapsed foot are poorly defined, which contributes to variability in outcome. The results suggest that a consensus for a definition of relapse is needed. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:639–645.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0040
Author(s):  
Kelly Cristina Stéfani ◽  
Davi de Podestá Haje ◽  
Monica Paschoal Nogueira

Category: Clubfoot Introduction/Purpose: The prevalence of untreated congenital clubfoot among children older than walking age is higher in developing countries due to limited resources for early care after birth. The Ponseti method represents an intervention option for older, untreated children. Methods: A metanalysis was conducted of observational studies selected through a systematic review of articles included in electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, Embase, Lilacs, and the Cochrane Library) until June 2017. A pooling analysis of proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and a publication bias assessment were performed as routine. Estimates of success, recurrence, and complication rates were weighted and pooled using the random effects model. Results: Twelve studies, including 654 feet diagnosed with congenital clubfoot in children older than walking age (older than 1 year old), were included for analysis. The rate of satisfactory outcomes found via a cluster metanalysis of proportions using the random effects model was 89% (95% CI = 0.82–0.94, p < 0.01), relative to the total analysed. The recurrence rate was 18% (95% CI = 0.14–0.24, p = 0.015), and the rate of casting complications was 7% (95% CI = 0.03–0.15, p = 0.19). Conclusion: Application of the Ponseti method in children with untreated idiopathic clubfoot older than walking age leads to satisfactory outcomes, has a low cost, and avoids surgical procedures likely to cause complications. The results obtained exhibited considerable heterogeneity.


Author(s):  
Gonca Cinkara ◽  
Ginger Beau Langbroek ◽  
Chantal M. A. M. van der Horst ◽  
Albert Wolkerstorfer ◽  
Sophie E. R. Horbach ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 64-71
Author(s):  
G. V. Divovich

Objective. Based on an analytical assessment of the results of surgical treatment of children with equinovarus foot deformity of various origins (idiopathic clubfoot, syndromic clubfoot), to determine a way of rational selection of surgical techniquesin each specifc case.Materials and methods. The results of the treatment of 78 children with congenital idiopathic clubfoot over the period 2010–2018 were assessed in comparison with the results of the treatment of 41 children with recurrent congenital clubfoot, whose primary treatment had been carried out before 2010. We have gained the experience in treating 30 children with severe clubfoot syndrome (meningomyelocele, CNS lesions, chromosomal diseases and others).Results. In the treatment of congenital clubfoot with the Ponseti method, recurrences occur in 21.79 % of the cases, and in the traditional treatment — in 57.74 %. The Ponseti surgical treatment of recurrences consists in performing release operations on the tendon-ligament apparatus from mini-accesses. Cases of rigid, long-standing deformities require extensive releases on soft tissues, as well as resection and arthrodesis interventions on the joints of the foot. The treatment of clubfoot syndrome requires “surgically aggressive” methods of correction in early childhood.Conclusion. In the idiopathic variants of clubfoot and its relapses, it is possible to correct the vicious position of the feet by minimally invasive operations with minimal damage to the tissues of the circumflex joints and without damage to the flexor tendons and their sheaths in the medial ankle area. Long-standing recurrent rigid variants, as well as syndromic clubfoot, presuppose the performance of extensive releases, osteotomies and arthrodetic resections of the joints of the foot at an early age. A promising direction for clubfoot correction in the process of child development is a surgery with the use of the bone growth potential of the lower leg and foot.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document