Biceps Tenodesis Demonstrates Lower Reoperation Rates Compared to SLAP Repair for Treatment of SLAP Tears in a Large Cross-sectional Population

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole M. Truong ◽  
Nicolas Cevallos ◽  
Drew A. Lansdown ◽  
C. Benjamin Ma ◽  
Brian T. Feeley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Slap Repair ◽  
Reoperation Rates

scholarly journals Variability in Rehabilitation Protocols after Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior Surgical Repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 243-248
Author(s):  
Christina Hermanns ◽  
Reed Coda ◽  
Sana Cheema ◽  
Matthew Vopat ◽  
Armin Tarakemeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Slap Repair ◽  
Rehabilitation Protocols ◽  
Google Search ◽  
Improve Patient ◽  
Anterior Posterior

Introduction. Rehabilitation after a superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) repair is an important aspect of patient outcomes, however, no standardized rehabilitation protocol has been defined. The purpose of this paper is to assess the variability of rehabilitation after SLAP repair to understand the need for standardization to improve patient outcomes. Methods. Protocols for SLAP repairs were collected through a search for Academic Orthopedic Programs and a general google search using the terms “[Program Name (if applicable)] SLAP Repair Rehab Protocol”. Protocols were compared by sling, range of motion (ROM), physical therapy, return to sport (RTS), return to throwing, and biceps engagement/ biceps tenodesis recommendations. Protocols for non-operative or generalized shoulders were excluded.  Results. Sixty protocols were included. A total of 61.7% (37/60) recommended a sling for four to six weeks and 90% (54/60) included a full ROM recommendation, but time was variable. There were different exercises recommended, but pendulum swings were recommended by 53% (32/60), submaximal isometrics by 55% (33/60), and scapular strengthening by 65% (39/60). Of the sixty protocols, 33% (20/60) recommended return to sports in 24 weeks and 38.3% (23/60) recommended allowing throwing in 16 weeks. Conclusion. There was variability in protocols for SLAP repair, especially time until full ROM, RTS, and biceps strengthening. Time in sling and scapular strengthening were the least variable. A lack of specificity within protocols in what return to throwing meant for functional ability made it difficult to compare protocols. Considering the large number of Orthopedic programs, a relatively small number had published protocols. Further studies are needed to evaluate a standardized post-operative rehabilitation for SLAP repairs to improve outcomes.

Biceps Tenodesis for Superior Labrum Anterior-Posterior Tear in the Overhead Athlete: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
pp. 036354652092117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Travis L. Frantz ◽  
Andrew G. Shacklett ◽  
Adam S. Martin ◽  
Jonathan D. Barlow ◽  
Grant L. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Overhead Athletes ◽  
Overhead Athlete ◽  
Slap Repair ◽  
Slap Tear ◽  
Anterior Posterior

Background: Superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesion is a common shoulder injury, particularly in overhead athletes. While surgical management has traditionally consisted of SLAP repair, high rates of revision and complications have led to alternative techniques, such as biceps tenodesis (BT). While BT is commonly reserved for older nonoverhead athletes, indications for its use have expanded in recent years. Purpose: To determine functional outcomes and return-to-sport rates among overhead athletes after BT for SLAP tear. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was performed for any articles published before July 2019. The search phrase “labral tear” was used to capture maximum results, followed by keyword inclusion of “SLAP tear” and “biceps tenodesis.” Inclusion criteria included outcome studies of BT for isolated SLAP tear in athletes participating in any overhead sports, not limited to throwing alone. Abstracts and manuscripts were independently reviewed to determine eligibility. When clearly delineated, outcome variables from multiple studies were combined. Results: After full review, 8 articles met inclusion criteria (99 athletes; mean age, 19.8-47 years), with baseball and softball players the most common among them (n = 62). Type II SLAP tear was the most common diagnosis, and 0% to 44% of athletes had a failed previous SLAP repair before undergoing BT. Only 1 study included patients with concomitant rotator cuff repair. Open subpectoral BT was most commonly used, and complication rates ranged from 0% to 14%, with wound erythema, traumatic biceps tendon rupture, brachial plexus neurapraxia, and adhesive capsulitis being reported. Combined reported postoperative functional scores were as follows: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, 81.7 to 97; 12-Item Short Form Health Survey physical, 50 to 54; visual analog scale for pain, 0.8-1.5; Kerlan Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, 66 to 79; and satisfaction, 80% to 87%. The overall return-to-sports rate for overhead athletes was 70% (60 of 86). For studies that clearly delineated outcomes based on level of play/athlete, the combined return-to-sports rate was 69% (11 of 16) for recreational overhead athletes, 80% (4 of 5) for competitive/collegiate athletes, and 60% (18 of 30) for professionals. Conclusion: BT in the overhead athlete offers encouraging functional outcomes and return-to-sports rates, particularly in the recreational athlete. It can be successfully performed as an index operation rather than SLAP repair, as well as in a younger patient population. Careful consideration should be given to elite overhead athletes, particularly pitchers, who tend to experience poorer outcomes.

Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis for Failed Type II SLAP Repair

Orthopedics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. e273-e728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil K. Gupta ◽  
Benjamin Bruce ◽  
Emma L. Klosterman ◽  
Frank McCormick ◽  
Joshua Harris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type Ii ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Slap Repair ◽  
Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis

Biceps Tenodesis as an Attractive Alternative to Superior Labral Anterior-Posterior (SLAP) Repair for Type II SLAP Lesions in Active-Duty Military Patients Younger Than 35 Years

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110493
Author(s):  
Nata Parnes ◽  
John C. Dunn ◽  
Hunter Czajkowski ◽  
Michael J. DeFranco ◽  
Clare K. Green ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Duty ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Active Duty Military ◽  
Slap Repair ◽  
Military Patients ◽  
Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Arthroscopic Slap Repair ◽  
Repair Group ◽  
Anterior Posterior

Background: Biceps tenodesis has been suggested as a superior surgical technique compared with isolated labral repair for superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears in patients older than 35 years. The superiority of this procedure in younger patients, however, is yet to be determined. Purpose: To compare the outcomes of arthroscopic SLAP repair with those of arthroscopic-assisted subpectoral biceps tenodesis for type II SLAP tears in active-duty military patients younger than 35 years. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Preoperative and postoperative evaluations with a minimum 5-year follow-up including the visual analog scale (VAS), the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score were administered, and scores were compared between 2 groups of patients younger than 35 years. One group included 25 patients who underwent SLAP repair, and the second group included 23 patients who underwent arthroscopic-assisted subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Results: The preoperative patient age ( P = .3639), forward flexion ( P = .8214), external rotation ( P = .5134), VAS pain score ( P = .4487), SANE score ( P = .6614), and ASES score ( P = .6519) did not vary significantly between the 2 study groups. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant increases in function as measured by the ASES and SANE and decreases in pain as measured by the VAS at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively. Also at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively, patients in the tenodesis group had lower pain (1.3 vs 2.6, respectively; P = .0358) and higher SANE (84.0 vs 63.3, respectively; P = .0001) and ASES (85.7 vs 75.4, respectively; P = .0342) scores compared with those in the repair group. Failure rate was 20.0% in the repair group versus 0.0% in the tenodesis group ( P = .0234). Conclusion: Active-duty military patients younger than 35 years with type II SLAP tears had more predictable improvement in pain, better functional outcomes, and lower failure rates after biceps tenodesis compared with SLAP repair for type II SLAP tears. Overall, the results of this study indicate that arthroscopic- assisted subpectoral biceps tenodesis is superior to arthroscopic SLAP repair for the treatment of type II SLAP tears in military patients younger than 35 years.

SLAP tears and return to sport and work: current concepts

2021 ◽  
pp. jisakos-2020-000537
Author(s):  
Matthew R LeVasseur ◽  
Michael R Mancini ◽  
Benjamin C Hawthorne ◽  
Anthony A Romeo ◽  
Emilio Calvo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Overhead Athletes ◽  
Slap Lesions ◽  
Slap Repair ◽  
Biceps Tenotomy ◽  
Sporting Activities

Superior labrum, anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions are common and identified in up to 26% of shoulder arthroscopies, with the greatest risk factor appearing to be overhead sporting activities. Symptomatic patients are treated with physical therapy and activity modification. However, after the failure of non-operative measures or when activity modification is precluded by athletic demands, SLAP tears have been managed with debridement, repair, biceps tenodesis or biceps tenotomy. Recently, there have been noticeable trends in the operative management of SLAP lesions with older patients receiving biceps tenodesis and younger patients undergoing SLAP repair, largely with suture anchors. For overhead athletes, particularly baseball players, SLAP lesions remain a difficult pathology to manage secondary to concomitant pathologies and unpredictable rates of return to play. As a consequence, the most appropriate surgical option in elite throwers is controversial. The objective of this current concepts review is to discuss the anatomy, mechanism of injury, presentation, diagnosis and treatment options of SLAP lesions and to present current literature on outcomes affecting return to sport and work.

scholarly journals Rates of Subsequent Shoulder Surgery Within Three Years for Patients Undergoing SLAP Repair Versus Biceps Tenodesis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. e129-e135
Author(s):  
Ravand S. Khazai ◽  
Cody S. Lee ◽  
Haroutioun H. Boyajian ◽  
Lewis L. Shi ◽  
Aravind Athiviraham
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Surgery ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Slap Repair

scholarly journals A Treatment-Based Algorithm for the Management of Type-II SLAP Tears

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 282-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam M. Johannsen ◽  
John G. Costouros
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Expert Opinion ◽  
Current Literature ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Slap Repair ◽  
Non Operative Management

Background: The management of Type-II superior labral tears (SLAP) of the shoulder remains a controversial topic. Treatment ranges from non-operative management to surgical management including SLAP repair, biceps tenotomy, and biceps tenodesis. An optimal treatment algorithm has yet to reach universal acceptance. Objective: The goal of this paper was to provide a treatment algorithm for the management of Type-II SLAP tears based on current literature and expert opinion. Method: Current literature was reviewed and expert opinion was reported to develop a comprehensive treatment protocol for patients based on age, activity level, and pathology. Results: Operative management of type-II SLAP tears yields good to excellent outcomes when proper indications are followed. Biceps tenodesis may produce more reliable pain relief and functional improvement when compared to primary SLAP repair in patients over the age of 40. Conclusion: When non-operative management of Type-II SLAP tears fails, operative management yields good to excellent outcomes in most patients. Primary SLAP repair should be performed in patients under the age of 40 with no evidence of proximal biceps pathology, while biceps tenodesis can provide consistent pain relief and return to activity in patients over the age of 40 or with significant proximal biceps pathology. Tenotomy should be reserved for elderly or low demand individuals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document