scholarly journals Pruning external minimality checking for answer set programs using semantic dependencies

2021 ◽  
Vol 290 ◽  
pp. 103402
Author(s):  
Thomas Eiter ◽  
Tobias Kaminski
2021 ◽  
pp. 103519
Author(s):  
Giovanni Amendola ◽  
Carmine Dodaro ◽  
Wolfgang Faber ◽  
Francesco Ricca
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stijn Heymans ◽  
Davy Van Nieuwenborgh ◽  
Dirk Vermeir

Author(s):  
Bo Yang ◽  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Mingyi Zhang ◽  
Maonian Wu
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 50-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chung-Hsien Wu ◽  
Liang-Chih Yu ◽  
Fong-Lin Jang

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (18) ◽  
pp. 2320-2326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carito Guziolowski ◽  
Santiago Videla ◽  
Federica Eduati ◽  
Sven Thiele ◽  
Thomas Cokelaer ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 800-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
DANIELA INCLEZAN

AbstractThis paper presents CoreALMlib, an $\mathscr{ALM}$ library of commonsense knowledge about dynamic domains. The library was obtained by translating part of the Component Library (CLib) into the modular action language $\mathscr{ALM}$. CLib consists of general reusable and composable commonsense concepts, selected based on a thorough study of ontological and lexical resources. Our translation targets CLibstates (i.e., fluents) and actions. The resulting $\mathscr{ALM}$ library contains the descriptions of 123 action classes grouped into 43 reusable modules that are organized into a hierarchy. It is made available online and of interest to researchers in the action language, answer-set programming, and natural language understanding communities. We believe that our translation has two main advantages over its CLib counterpart: (i) it specifies axioms about actions in a more elaboration tolerant and readable way, and (ii) it can be seamlessly integrated with ASP reasoning algorithms (e.g., for planning and postdiction). In contrast, axioms are described in CLib using STRIPS-like operators, and CLib's inference engine cannot handle planning nor postdiction.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 623-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
ARINDAM MITRA ◽  
CHITTA BARAL

AbstractOver the years the Artificial Intelligence (AI) community has produced several datasets which have given the machine learning algorithms the opportunity to learn various skills across various domains. However, a subclass of these machine learning algorithms that aimed at learning logic programs, namely the Inductive Logic Programming algorithms, have often failed at the task due to the vastness of these datasets. This has impacted the usability of knowledge representation and reasoning techniques in the development of AI systems. In this research, we try to address this scalability issue for the algorithms that learn answer set programs. We present a sound and complete algorithm which takes the input in a slightly different manner and performs an efficient and more user controlled search for a solution. We show via experiments that our algorithm can learn from two popular datasets from machine learning community, namely bAbl (a question answering dataset) and MNIST (a dataset for handwritten digit recognition), which to the best of our knowledge was not previously possible. The system is publicly available athttps://goo.gl/KdWAcV.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document